This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Oloode (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
The first thing that shows up in a Google search for this man is something from the United Nations (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/member_loode.pdf). The overall problem here is the conflict of interest, and the lack of viewpoints. Perhaps the best approach is to recommend this article for deletion, regular deletion, and get the viewpoint of multiple editors. // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 02:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As an Estonian who has some knowledge in the Fenno-Ugric matters, I can confirm that on the scale of the international Fenno-Ugric movement, Oliver Loode should be notable enough. Of course, one might say that the whole movement is insignificant by the standards of English Wikipedia. Still, I'd recommend improving the article with additional sources, not deletion. Concerning the lack of viewpoints - well, in most cases, there aren't really many viewpoints on a minor (non-celebrity, non-political) biographical article, if biographical facts aren't contested. Sorry, forgot to sign in. --Oop (talk) 08:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) - this is a translation from existing article in Estonian. The importance of the article (and the individual about whom it is) is not for the author to decide, this was just an attempt at translation. Oloode (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reference added, addressing other potential issues
A reference to UNPFII website (confirming status as Member of UNPFII) has been added, so there is at least one reference. On the question of potentially biased content. All statements in the article are based on facts that can be verified through sources in Estonian (which is the original language of the article). On notability: The article has been accepted as legitimate in Estonian Wikipedia. The purpose of this translation was simply to broaden the audience of potential readers, not to imply that the person in question is a global rock star or thought leader. Alternative and neutral viewpoints on this would be appreciated. Oloode (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
