Jump to content

Talk:OpenAI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Stated goals

[edit]

The article starts with the stated goals of OpenAI. I think that should be replaced with what the company actually does. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The aim to build AGI is pretty unusual yet central to the company, and the term "safe and beneficial" is appropriately quoted. So in my opinion, it's not really a problem, but I don't know what other contributors think. Alenoach (talk) 15:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is worth noting that the mission is not to build AGI, though I agree that the company currently aims to do so.
The charter blog post says:
> OpenAI’s mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work—benefits all of humanity. We will attempt to directly build safe and beneficial AGI, but will also consider our mission fulfilled if our work aids others to achieve this outcome.
(I have edited the page to fix this.) Rgreenblatt1 (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SearchGPT

[edit]

As per MOS:LEAD I think it is worth mentioning launch of SearchGPT in lead. people keep removing it. it is a major product they launched in several months. Astropulse (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alenoach Astropulse (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a message that I posted on Astropulse's Talk page:
Hi Astropulse, I think it's still a bit too early to mention SearchGPT in the lead section of the article on OpenAI. But maybe one day, if it's fully released and has significant notability, it would be good to change the sentence "As a leading organization in the ongoing AI boom, OpenAI is known for the GPT family of large language models, the DALL-E series of text-to-image models, and a text-to-video model named Sora." into something like "As a leading organization in the ongoing AI boom, OpenAI is known for the GPT family of large language models, the DALL-E series of text-to-image models, a text-to-video model named Sora and the search engine SearchGPT."
And the response:
MOS:LEAD lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It gives the basics in a nutshell and cultivates interest in reading on. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.
It doesn't need to be significant notability. just notable. It launch has received lots of attention and is worth mentioning in lead
The choice of mentioning it in the lead or not is not obvious. There are various reliable sources on it, but like for a lot of things related to OpenAI that are not in the lead. I guess I would at least wait for the full release before mentioning it, if it's significant enough, by modifying the sentence "As a leading organization ...", because if readers can't yet use SearchGPT, perhaps it's not yet relevant for them to have it in the lead.
I'll let other Wikipedia editors decide on this. Alenoach (talk) 22:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We just adding On July 26 2024, OpenAI announced SearchGPT an AI powered search engine. Astropulse (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
its a separate sentence Astropulse (talk) 23:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if you argue for adding this as the separate sentence "On July 26 2024, OpenAI announced SearchGPT an AI powered search engine.", then it's lengthier and I'm more opposed, sorry. There are really a lot of things with OpenAI that make news headlines. But I propose to wait for the feedback of other contributors to see what they think. Alenoach (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no doubt that SearchGPT will be notable enough to mention in the lead once launched, but what's the rush? Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS and so far all we have is routine announcement coverage that all says the same thing. We don't even know if it will be available this year (after they released and then un-released browsing in ChatGPT last year I'd expect them to be cautious with the timeline). Lets wait until the article has substantial coverage, right now there are just 2 sentences about it. Jamedeus (talk) 01:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]