Talk:OpenProj

This article was nominated for deletion on November 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on October 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Tahoeob (talk · contribs) has been paid by Serena Software. Declaration while asking for help.

First deletion discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This software is quite useful, and is probably as notable as other open source project management software. I would prefer to complete the article, rather than delete it. Brianegge 22:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When an article is being considered for deletion there is a message at the top of the article which includes a link to the place where discussion about the deletion can take place. (SEWilco 17:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Agreed, this is useful software. The article should be tidied up, especially consider the popularity of this software. (Rupertheathen —Preceding comment was added at 19:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Software Notability

The following information needs to be added to the article to make it clear that it is notable:

List of Reviews in:

   * Newspaper articles;
   * Books;
   * User Guides;
   * TV Documentaries;
   * Magazine Reviews;

List of distributions that include it;
List of:

   * Multiple non-trivial articles;
   * Reliable published works:
         o newspaper and magazine articles;
         o books;
         o television documentaries;
         o websites;
         o published reports by consumer watchdog organizations;
   * Awards it has won;
   * Distribution channels;

jonathon 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]