Jump to content

Talk:Open casket (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 7 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Open casketOpen casket (disambiguation) – It seems obvious that the funerary meaning of this term is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, so this should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. The other listed meanings are rather obscure. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My impression is that "open casket" is a colloquial phrase that refers to Funeral#Visitation, which is the target of the "open casket funeral" redirect. That section of that article explicitly describes the term "open casket", placing it in quotes. Even if that material should be somewhat rewritten to improve it, that article is where this topic is discussed. I don't think that phrase is ordinarily used to refer to just any coffin that is open. The coffin article does not contain the term "open casket". Indeed it does not even contain the word "open". So that article fails the WP:DABMENTION test for "open casket". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any mention of "open casket" or any use of the word "open" at all in the Human composting article. So that article also fails the WP:DABMENTION test. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.