A fact from Opera Krakowska appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This opera company is anything but a leading, in its line of business.
Come here, visit the place and write that again. The new building was by the public chosen as the worst new construction of the year in 2009, people call it the "pink TESCO" - the english wikipedia text states, it is inviting tourists. Also it says, that world-class soloists come to sing - yes they come, if they are polish and get well paid, no for the class of the musicians. Somehow my impression is, that this article neads a complete, objective revision! Only the truth can ensure that the responsible guys take action and try hard to make this opera house worth the name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lumenor (talk • contribs) 18:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]