Talk:PHUNK

Phunk Studio article for Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

Dear members, I recognise Phunk as a home-grown talent and deserving documentation on Wikipedia. Having said that i note of the article's slant towards advertising, and therefore advised the page's developers to continue to work towards the guidelines stipulated by Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. It also improves the writing credibility to meet GA criteria, and to be recommended as a Good Article. Let's work towards that -- Marcuslim (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Creative Review reference (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=48022303065&ref=mf) and Asia Tatler reference (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=48026483065&ref=mf) links to Phunk Studio's Facebook fan page where the articles are reposted; not an unbiased source. Could not locate original sources for the articles. Removing the references until they can be re-sourced. Removed the extensive list of publications, lectures, etc. as they read more like a resume. Removed quotes about LASALLE College of the Arts as they do not directly apply to the subject. Mortal (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]