Talk:Peter Scholze

A news item involving Peter Scholze was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 August 2018.

Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on April 28 2011. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

Thanks

Thanks to Mifter for the protection level, but...

The "Fields Medal (2018)" is still in the infobox. This is the medal that will be awarded in August, and of course we don't know for sure this man will be awarded it yet. I therefore say this should be removed and kept out until the date: 1 August 2018, 12:30 pm BST. At which point the medal will be awarded and it can be added to the article of whoever won it.

Google "When is the 2018 fields medal awarded?" or read this nature article where it says the award will happen "in August at the 2018 International Congress of Mathematicians in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil." Note the ICM will be between 1-9 August 2018.

86.185.214.139 (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purely local aspects

The article says that "Scholze's work has concentrated on purely local aspects of arithmetic geometry". That may be true for his earliest work, but it's not true anymore. His paper "On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties" is about number fields, i.e. global number theory. --Letkhfan (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

False claim about condensed mathematics

"Scholze and Dustin Clausen proposed a program for condensed mathematics—a project to unify various mathematical subfields, including topology, geometry, functional analysis and number theory." The claim that its purpose is to unify these fields is false. For now, I am replacing it with "Scholze and Dustin Clausen proposed a program for condensed mathematics."

This how Scholze himself described it: "Condensed mathematics claims that topological spaces are the wrong definition, and that one should replace them with the slightly different notion of condensed sets." Source: https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/2020/12/05/liquid-tensor-experiment/

73.84.185.202 (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scholze made an interesting remark here:

https://differentialgeometri.wordpress.com/2020/12/12/algebraic-geometry-and-its-plot-to-take-over-the-analytic-world/

"As I hope was clear from the phrasing, the opening paragraphs from my

course were not at all serious (I mean, Mumford was joking, so was I). I

have no ambitions to overtake analysis, I just want to be able to talk

about those parts of analysis that I care most about in a way that

combines seamlessly with how arguments work in arithmetic/algebraic

geometry. The hope that this could be done resulted from having had to

do quite a bit of p-adic analysis, and this never felt much like

analysis to me.

So yes, I just hope that it may be a helpful alternative language for

some analytic questions close to algebraic geometry." Ndcroos (talk) 10:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]