Talk:Pilot-induced oscillation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Promotes the subject?

This article is tagged as promoting it's subject. I can't see that.

(also,it's strange that it accumulated 2 templates without having a talk page) Anniepoo (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expert needed

This article needs the attention of a skilled wordsmith who also has some expertise in the subject of PIO. At present, the article is an assembly of isolated paragraphs - there is no organisation to the presentation of information. It gives the impression of having been visited by a number of individual editors and each one has added his favorite bit of information on the subject. The article also contains numerous colloquial expressions:

As such it is a coupling of the frequency
In a controls sense
The problem has been mitigated in some cases
cause the aircraft to climb, say, by applying up-elevator
A pilot aiming for a 500 foot per minute descent, for example, may find himself descending too rapidly
A natural reaction to this is to push the nose down harder than one pulled it up, but then the pilot ends up staring at the ground.

At present, the article looks too much like a guide-book. WP:NOT shows that WP is not a guide-book or a text book. Dolphin (t) 11:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

external links are dead

Both external links to NASA videos return a access denied error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.90.172.151 (talk) 20:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link to Air Force white paper

The link in the References section titled "Air Force white paper which includes definitions and history of PIO problems" links to the URL https://research.maxwell.af.mil/papers/ay2004/afit/AFIT-GAE-ENY-04-M16.pdf, which returns a "site can't be reached" error. I have found the paper at another link https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.669.9089&rep=rep1&type=pdf and propose to update to this publicly-available link.0dj0bz (talk) 01:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this link as it was redundant from the References list. I have also updated the reference to a publicly-available site at the URL https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA424366.pdf. 0dj0bz (talk) 04:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content needs references

Many sections of this page contain statements that have no references. Many of these are from the Witte ^[1] thesis, it seems. Some time needs to be invested in documenting these referenced items.0dj0bz (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA424366.pdf

[1] ttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA424366.pdf

[1]