Talk:Polynesian Adventure Tours

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Proposed deletion

No secondary sources were added and no challenges to non-notability raised since February 2009. Brianhe (talk) 14:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After removing blatant self-promotion there's basically a single trade magazine award (Metro Magazine). Is this now notable? -- Brianhe (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other transportation company articles include their routes. The entries that Brianhe deleted were facts about the company and did not refer to a specific tour product (except for the President Obama tour). So should we go through all the transp company pages and delete the routes that they have posted, as that certainly also is blatant self-promotion? Glensan (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2009

I would say it depends how the information is presented. In this case, I don't see a problem with the mentions in the opening paragraph, as they flesh out the scope of the company a bit (though the mentions strike me as obvious, since any Hawaii-based tour company that DOESN'T offer tours to those mentioned places isn't going to be in business long, but anyway...). Creating a section specifically to list the available destinations starts to look like a travel brochure, and that's where we start to run into problems.

If the company is notable (as in: mentioned in 3rd-party publications) for offering trips to locations that other companies do not ("They'll lower you by helicopter into Mauna Loa so you can scoop out some lava" for an extreme/absurd example), then that would be an acceptable section, if properly sourced. Arakunem^Talk 16:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion hasn't answered the question whether the company itself is notable per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). I would argue that the coverage currently cited is "trivial or incidental," in particular the 2004 Honolulu Star piece on the company sale. Other than this there are just a couple of industry or self-awarded citations. -- Brianhe (talk) 18:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Polynesian Adventure Tours. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090522185723/http://www.polyad.com:80/node/803 to http://www.polyad.com/node/803

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]