Talk:Pore-forming toxin

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Created Bassophile 15:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ply-em.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ply-em.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move of article from "Pore-forming toxin" to "Pore-forming protein"

I don't agree with the recent move of the article from "Pore-forming toxin" to "pore-forming protein." Gram-negative bacteria make plenty of pore-forming outer membrane proteins that aren't exotoxins, but this article is only about the toxins. The new title is going to generate confusion. CatPath (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted the article back to "Pore-forming toxin." The change to the new title should be discussed first. CatPath (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@CatPath: Good point - I jumped the gun a bit on that one. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 04:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding section on acronym origin?

I always wondered why binary toxin was called CDT. I thought I'd look into it. The first references are in 1987/88 from:

Popoff, M. R., Rubin, E. J., Gill, D. M., & Boquet, P. (1988). Actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase produced by a Clostridium difficile strain. Infection and immunity, 56(9), 2299-2306.
Popoff, M. R., & Boquet, P. (1988). Clostridium spiroforme toxin is a binary toxin which ADP-ribosylates cellular actin. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 152(3), 1361-1368.

Oddly, Popoff & Boquet 1988 cites a paper which was unpublished at the time. The authors are French, which makes me wonder if the French equivalent for "ADP-ribosyltransferase" would have a different word order. That's one possibility I've come up with so far. Otherwise, perhaps its an abbreviation for C. difficule transferase?. In the paper it makes no sense as read. It is:

"We have recently isolated an ADP-ribosyl transferase (CDT) from a strain of C. difficile (CD196) which modifies cell actin as C.botulinum C2 component I or iota i_a chain do (II)."

Makes absolutely no sense to me...150.135.214.170 (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC) (JWA posting as anon)[reply]