Jump to content

Talk:Proco Joe Moreno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

This fellow's on the Chicago City Council, as I understand. Surely that makes him eligible for WP:POLITICIAN? Regardless - give me five minutes to get some sourcing, but there's no reason for this to be deleted. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. It's quick and dirty, but it should do the trick for now. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:49, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence yet he fulfills the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN I'm an elected member of Preston City Council and I don't fulfill the requirements. Prestonmag (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:POLITICIAN:
Generally speaking, mayors of cities of at least regional importance are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city.
While this is "generally speaking", I think Chicago qualifies as "a major metropolitan city". The three references I posted were about the first three that I found in a cursory Google search; I'm sure that deeper searching would yield more press coverage. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mobster

[edit]

Can anyone tell me why is he in the category of "mobsters from chicago"? —usernamekiran(talk) 21:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No idea but any contentious unsourced material regarding a living person should be removed immediately. I have removed the category per WP:BLPCAT. Politrukki (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Proco Joe Moreno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]