Talk:Pseudolarix amabilis

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to Pseudolarix amabilis

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudolarix → Pseudolarix amabilis – Given that the genus is not monotypic, this article should be moved to the species title Pseudolarix amabilis, with a genus article left at Pseudolarix noting both the living species and the extinct Pseudolarix wehrii from the early Eocene of Western North America (Klondike Mountain Formation Allenby Formation), and late Eocene of Axel Heiberg Island. Kev min § 15:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, provided that either the genus article discusses the extinct species or it has its own article (less usual). Peter coxhead (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support current content and page history mostly pertains to the single living species, and this history and content should be associated with the title Pseudolarix amabilis. A new article should be written for content pertaining to the genus as a whole and the fossil species. Plantdrew (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have already started a species article in my draft space for Pseudolarix wehrii @Peter coxhead: & @Plantdrew:.--Kev min § 17:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an additional note, there is at least one more fossil species, Pseudolarix japonica, from Miocene to Pliocene deposits in Korea and Japan.--Kev min § 21:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pseudolarix wehrii live

Just a quick note for @Peter coxhead: & @Plantdrew:, Pseudolarix wehrii is now live.--Kev min § 13:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]