Talk:Public Religion Research Institute

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Studio34designs (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Not public data?

I don't see the public datasets. Looks like there's a fee to view the data. Article should be corrected. --74.202.39.3 (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content

The article has been tagged for almost 7 years because of promotional content, I removed this content, but User:Studio34designs has replaced it without the addition of sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: they've been blocked. "16:33, 13 March 2019 The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs | block) blocked Studio34designs (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ({{uw-spamublock}} )" Doug Weller talk 16:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography moved from article space

Books:

Jones, Robert P. (February 1, 2007). Liberalism's Troubled Search for Equality: Religion and Cultural Bias in the Oregon Physician-Assisted Suicide Debates. University of Notre Dame Press. ISBN 978-0268032678.
Jones, Robert Patrick (July 25, 2008). Progressive & Religious: How Christian, Jewish, Muslim, and Buddhist Leaders are Moving Beyond the Culture Wars and Transforming American Public Life. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0742562301.
Jones, Robert P. (July 12, 2016). The End of White Christian America. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9781501122293.
Jones, Robert P.; Smith, Ted A., eds. (December 22, 2017). Spirit and Capital in an Age of Inequality. Routledge. ISBN 9781315413518.
Jones, Robert P. (July 28, 2020). White Too Long: The Legacy of White Supremacy in American Christianity. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9781982122881.

Selected articles:

Jones, Robert P. (August 21, 2014). "Self-Segregation: Why It's So Hard for Whites to Understand Ferguson". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (July 12, 2016). "The Eclipse of White Christian America". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Robert P. Jones (July 16, 2016). "Are Trump Supporters Nostalgic For A Fading White, Christian America?". Weekend Edition Saturday (Interview transcript). Interviewed by Linda Wertheimer. NPR. Retrieved July 29, 2020. I'm going to restore power to the Christian churches. We're not going to be saying Happy Holidays. We're going to be saying Merry Christmas again in this country.
Jones, Robert P. (August 14, 2016). "How Trump Remixed the Republican 'Southern Strategy'". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (November 10, 2016). "The Rage of White, Christian America". The New York Times (subscription required) (op-ed). Retrieved August 1, 2020. ... the loudest voices of [the 2016] election turned out to be not the 'new America' demographic groups of Latinos, African-Americans and millennials, but Mr. Trump's aging and raging white Christian supporters.
Jones, Robert P. (January 27, 2017). "Not Even the Reddest States Support Deportation". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (May 2, 2017). "The Collapse of American Identity". The New York Times (subscription required) (op-ed). Retrieved August 1, 2020. leaders of both parties will have to ... [take up the] arduous task of weaving a new national narrative in which all Americans can see themselves.
Robert P. Jones (July 2, 2017). "How Party And Place Shape Americans' Views On Discrimination". Code Switch (Interview). Interviewed by Gene Demby. NPR. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (July 4, 2017). "Trump Can't Reverse the Decline of White Christian America". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (April 20, 2018). "White Evangelicals Can't Quit Donald Trump". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (May 31, 2018). "Country Music Is Singin' a Pro-L.G.B.T. Tune". The New York Times (op-ed). Retrieved August 1, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (June 25, 2019). "The Electoral Time Machine That Could Reelect Trump". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Robert P. Jones (June 19, 2020). "This is a moment of reckoning on race for White Christians" (Interview). Interviewed by Daniel Burke. CNN. Retrieved August 1, 2020. CNN spoke to Jones recently about why so many White Christians turn a blind eye to racism, how white supremacy took hold of American culture and what Christians can do now to make amends.
Jones, Robert P. (July 27, 2020). "Racism among white Christians is higher than among the nonreligious. That's no coincidence". NBC News. Retrieved August 2, 2020.
Jones, Robert P. (July 28, 2020). "White Christian America Needs a Moral Awakening". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
Robert P. Jones (July 30, 2020). "American Christianity Must Reckon With Legacy Of White Supremacy, Author Says". Fresh Air (Interview). Interviewed by Terry Gross. NPR. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
Robert P. Jones (August 2, 2020). "The Theological Roots of White Supremacy" (Interview). Interviewed by Francis Wilkinson. Bloomberg Opinion. Retrieved August 2, 2020. Properly understood, white supremacy is not fringe at all but actually has framed the entire American story. Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad source

The community has listed this article as badly sourced, with the poll having very low poll numbers, polling 300 people out of sometimes hundreds of thousands of people in one state is not nearly enough polling data, plus it gives dishonest and skewed results. I vote we disuse this source as it's a piss poor survey. Additionally, there is a notability issue in general with PRRI according to their Wiki page. There are too many flaws. Lmharding (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lmharding What source? Where do you get the stuff about dishones/skewed results? I've removed the old notices as no longer applicable. I see no notability issue and presume you haven't actually looked for sources. as you mention only the article page. Doug Weller talk 15:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the notability tag were relevant here, tags on Wikipedia articles are not a measure of a source's reliability. It looks like you removed this source from a bunch of articles and were reverted. A good next step would be to seek consensus on PRRI's reliability at WP:RSN. This isn't a particularly good place to discuss it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to prri.org. According to data lists behind the polls available only up to 300 people are polled out of tens of thousands or more populating each state leading to skewed rigged results. Going to the reliable source perennial.Lmharding (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lmharding snd yet they are used by reliable sources. What are your sources for their being skewed and dishonest? Doug Weller talk 18:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]