Talk:Quintonil

Quintonil has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Food and drink: Foodservice / Michelin Guide Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Michelin Guide task force.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

A fact from Quintonil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Pujol and Quintonil are the highest-rated restaurants in Mexico's first Michelin guide, with two Michelin stars each?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pujol (restaurant).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 04:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants tied with two Michelin stars, the highest ratings in Mexico's first guide?

Source: [1] On Tuesday, the Michelin Guide announced its first-ever rankings for the country, with two two-star restaurants and 16 one-star spots.

ALT1: ... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants were awarded two Michelin stars in Mexico's first guide? Source: [2] On Tuesday, the Michelin Guide announced its first-ever rankings for the country, with two two-star restaurants and 16 one-star spots.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Girl Friday (TV programme)
Comment: 5x expanded / created. It says 1 QPQ is required, but this is a multi-nomination: Template:Did you know nominations/Mrs. Brisby

5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.

(CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Hi! Thanks for reviewing it. I noticed that I could also expand List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico. Can I add it to this nomination as follows?

ALT2: ... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants tied with two Michelin stars, the highest ratings in Mexico's first guide?

Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: Sure. My review is as follows. Epicgenius (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

The List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico article is new enough, long enough, sourced, and has no issues with neutrality or plagiarism. As with my review above, the nomination is good to go with 3 bolded links. Epicgenius (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 03:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Quintonil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snatch! TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: Finished. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 01:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Copyedited article myself, so it should be good now; didn't find any typos.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not bombarded with words on the WTW list. Fiction and list incorporation policies do not apply.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Reference section is available.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Plenty o' reliable sources here! We've got coverage from CNN, Time Out, Eater, The Infatuation, Bon Appetit, Restaurant, Bloomberg, and El Universal.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Spotchecking proves there is no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Broad coverage of the restaurant's description, history, and reception can be found. This is adequate information for an article about a restaurant.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Article is focused.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Article is neutral; it does not try to promote or criticize the restaurant itself.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Logo is in the public domain. Restaurant is under CC BY 2.0. Rest of the images are freely licensed.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	While the logo and restaurant building images are relevant, the eleven food images crammed into the description section don't seem to have a purpose. However, this isn't a major obstacle, so I'll let it slide. Captions are suitable.
	7. Overall assessment.	Yum!

Quickfail?

Y Article is stable.
Y Earwig top result: 24.8%. No severe copyright violations.
Y No mistakes in previous GA reviews to note.
Y No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
Y No glaring errors.

Comment

@Tbhotch: I think this sentence should be moved to the Description section: "It has volcanic stone floors and wood and mirrored walls." ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good idea. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 14:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

daily menu restaurant - As in the restaurant's menu is changed every day?

Yes. Does a term exist in English? Because I only found Menú del día

that are uncommon to taste in dishes - Tried rewording it to "that are uncommon in dishes". That correct?
Could remove the citation. The fact is cited later in the article.

Removed

Description

"are brought" -> "are sourced"?

Changed

Should there be a separate section for the gallery?
Dishes include common ingredients like beans, squash, various chiles, and mushrooms - So like, the ingredients are dishes by themselves?

Reworded, I think.

A variation of the Mole Madre sold at Pujol is also available. - Not sure why this is mentioned if the reader doesn't know what the dish is.

I linked it to the mole itself

The wine menu is mainly European, with Mexican variants, - Does that mean the wine mostly comes from Europe?
Are the Mexican beverages on the wine menu?

Reworded, I think, for both.

Was the Entomophagy Festival a one-time thing? If so, when did it happen?
but business casual is commonly seen - Seems travel guide-esque or like a piece of advice you're trying to give to the reader. Should this be removed?

I removed the statement.

History

Not sure why we need a link to "high school"
and they became a couple - Kinda feels awkward and unnecessary to squeeze this detail in. It doesn't sound right to me.
Cut "according to them"
into their homes like friends - Don't you mean neighbors?

Reworded, for these three points.

they even lived on the second floor of the restaurant for five years - I'm not sure if this is what directly inspired them to open a restaurant with a "family concept". It seems like trivia to me.
contribute to the menus with their reimagining of Quintonil's recipes -> "...provide new dishes"?

Reworded

Reception

infrequent vegetables and herbs - What?
Tried replacing the Bon Appetit sentence with an actual quote from the source. Not sure if that works.
~~Shouldn't the Restaurant magazine ranks go in chronological order?~~

Spotchecking

Five sources. Go! (References of this revision.)
#6 N - Neither this source nor #7 mentions the nine-course tasting menu or the a la carte menu.
#10 Y Y Y
#18 N - Doesn't really mention the "cooking style" part
#25 Y
#29 Y
Changed and reworded. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.