Talk:RAK Airways
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fleet / Fleet age
[edit]the article is using conflicting sources - one says there's two planes and the other calculates the average age incl. two more. Please agree on one of them. Mark 84.143.163.2 (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Style
[edit]This article is written like an ad. Cna someone re-write it neutrally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.229.84 (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have removed the most egregious problems. As a side note, you are certainly allowed to make such edits yourself. The only part I hesitated in taking out was the phrase "value-for-money." The normal meaning of that term doesn't apply here. It is possible that something similar could be added if we could get a better explanation and a reliable source. That is, it makes sense for us to have a sentence that defines what it's basic target market is--the phrase seems to imply something between budget and luxury, but just wasn't clear. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Apparently they're trying to position themselves between LCCs and full-service, and I've added a Bloomberg cite saying so. Jpatokal (talk) 09:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class Defunct Airlines articles
- Defunct Airlines task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class United Arab Emirates articles
- Low-importance United Arab Emirates articles
- Start-Class Ras Al Khaimah articles
- Unknown-importance Ras Al Khaimah articles
- Ras Al Khaimah articles
- WikiProject United Arab Emirates articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles