Talk:Rajputs of Nepal

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 May 2019 by reviewer Zanhe (talk · contribs).

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Battle of Ligligkot.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1) This article makes many references to the term 'Rajput' without demonstrating appropriate historical data to support the author's claims. 2) The author/contributor conflates the dynastic periods in Nepali history without critically analysing the different origins and ethnic backgrounds of the personnages. Their argument seems to be that the different Indo-Aryan dynasties that have ruled Nepal for the past 1500 years are related lineage-wise to today's Khas-Gorkha upper castes that claim 'Rajput' origins. This argument is not supported by any historical data on Nepal. Second, it takes the Indian title of 'Rajput' at face value without critically examining its usages in history. 3) The author/contributor has used a biased political position in a discussion on the 'Nepali' language and had deleted an addition of mine that critically analysed the biased position. My change on the page was to show that the language that we today know as Nepali was known in Nepal till the end of the 19th century as 'Khas kura/Gorkha bhasa/Parbatiya'. In their comment on my addition, they called the addition as 'Newari POV', which is an erroneous and biased claim since we have historical evidence from the early 20th century of the Rana government of Nepal declaring the Gorkha language as 'Nepali' at the behest of Gorkhali intellectuals in India.^[1] 4) The writer confuses between basic sociological concepts like class and caste. ANM (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the text, successive dynasties of Nepal need to be rendered in their proper chronological order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanbau (talk • contribs) 12:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Onta, Pratyoush. 1999. "The Career of Bhanubhakta as a History of Nepali National Culture, 1940-1999." Studies in Nepal History and Society4(1): 65-136.

[1] Onta, Pratyoush. 1999. "The Career of Bhanubhakta as a History of Nepali National Culture, 1940-1999." Studies in Nepal History and Society4(1): 65-136.

[1]