This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Rebecca Leigh Longendyke appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that model Rebecca Leigh Longendyke was working as a waitress when she was chosen to star in a Saint Laurent campaign? Source: Wall Street Journal
Created and nominated for DYK on the same day, and is just over 1500 bytes, satisfying date and length criteria. I'll assume good faith for the Wall Street Journal reference, to which I have access to only the first two paragraphs. The text is supported by the supplied references. (However, I would format this ref using {{cite interview}}.) Hooks are suitably short; I'll assume good faith for the original (the first 2 paragraphs of WSJ only state she wanted to study science, source 1 states she was a biomed student, and in the interview in source 5 she states she has a university degree) and ALT1 (in the paywalled portion of WSJ). Trillfendi has already stated a QPQ will be forthcoming.
The only reason I'm not immediately promoting this is because, in my opinion, there's a bit of padding: the career section has two long lists of brands, and a shorter third list; and phrases such as "Her parents both work in the financial field, with her father being an accountant and her mother a loan officer" could be simplified by excluding the leading portion. You can add a bit of text by expanding the intro, shifting its second sentence to the career section, then summarizing the rest. (For example, something like "she has walked for numerous global brands and appeared on the covers of various fashion magazines".) Mindmatrix20:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mindmatrix: I added to the article info that which was available. For what it’s worth, the Journal reference says with her degree in biomedical engineering then goes on to talk to her about some alternative career prospect as a scientist; I’m not in the business of throwing my own opinions of people’s careers into the article, in fact, the list only give just a few notable examples that were verifiable. Trillfendi (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Heythereimaguy and Trillfendi: I don't quite like either of these hooks. ALT0 seems to play on the idea that fashion models are stereotypically dumb—as if she's "one of the smart ones". ALT1 is kinda of dull story; we've all heard of an actor or other entertainment-industry performer quitting their day job waiting tables. I've suggested an ALT2, would that work? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 22:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: Grey’s Anatomy was my other idea (though I assumed it was too reliant on Grey’s popularity or something). Many models these days have scientific degrees, that’s what I was trying to highlight, not that models are stupid and one-dimensional which is a tired trope. Examples include Adesuwa Aighewi, Julia Nobis, and Anok Yai, Lyndsey Scott, Nadja Bender, and Riley Montana. Trillfendi (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trillfendi: it is a tired trope; I didn't think you meant to play on it. I'm not sure if there's a way to get across the message you want to send on that one, unfortunately—and Grey's is popular enough that it should be fine, if not astounding. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Created and nominated for DYK on the same day, and is just over 1500 bytes, satisfying date and length criteria. I'll assume good faith for the Wall Street Journal reference, to which I have access to only the first two paragraphs. The text is supported by the supplied references. (However, I would format this ref using {{cite interview}}.) Hooks are suitably short; I'll assume good faith for the original (the first 2 paragraphs of WSJ only state she wanted to study science, source 1 states she was a biomed student, and in the interview in source 5 she states she has a university degree) and ALT1 (in the paywalled portion of WSJ). Trillfendi has already stated a QPQ will be forthcoming.
Well then, this seems good to go (paywall hook reference accepted in good faith). No preference for either hook. Heythereimaguy (talk) 20:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
