Talk:Rebel Alliances

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Redirects for discussion

07 Nov 2024 – Pauletta Brupbakher (talk · edit · hist) →Paulette Brupbacher was RfDed by Fram (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

13 Aug 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Requests for comments

13 Oct 2024 – Antifa (United States) (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Aquillion (t · c); see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Requested moves

06 Nov 2024 – 2019 Tacoma attack (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to 2019 Tacoma, Washington attack by Another Believer (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

01 Oct 2024 – Draft:Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c)
04 Nov 2024 – Draft:Escape Crops in Southeast Asia (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by McbCC1 (t · c) was moved to Draft:Escape crops in Southeast Asia (talk · edit · hist) by Czar (t · c) on 06 Nov 2024

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (521)

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing

moving this source here

Garland, Christian (March 2007). "Anarchism Strikes Back (Rev. of Rebel Alliances)" (PDF). Radical Philosophy (142): 53–54.

Because it is not a review of this book This book may, indeed, be mentioned in this review, but, if so, it ought to be an in-line source.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

??? Yes it is. See page 53. Please restore the ref. czar 06:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

No claim to notability is made, and the reviews are mainly to anarchist publicaitons, which support w=notabiity weakly, at best.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was reviewed with depth in six sources and there is more than enough linked content with which to write an article. It would, without doubt, survive an AfD. czar 06:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a prod template. A handful of reviews in specialist journals is not enough for notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]