Jump to content

Talk:Recorded Music NZ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Rianz-logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Rianz-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PPNZ merge into RIANZ

[edit]

considering PPNZ is a division of RIANZ, I don't think it needs its own page. Let me know what you think.-- Danreilly123(talk) 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as above.-- Danreilly123(talk) 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The two entities have seperate roles (RIANZ is a representative body, PPNZ is a performance rights society). In a larger historical context, there has been widespread confusion of the roles of each caused by incorporating them under one unbrella. Ppnz (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No consensus, no activity for seven-and-a-half months, so will remove merge tags. Adabow (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

Please fill in as much of the infobox as you can!Adabow (talk) 03:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a Most #1 Albums list

[edit]

Would be good to add a most #1 albums list on the NZ Albums Chart —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJS2050 (talkcontribs) 13:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Single certification levels

[edit]

According to a scan of The complete New Zealand music charts, 1966-2006: singles, albums, DVDs, compilations from 2007, the certification levels for singles have gone up and down through the ages.

Can we please put those changes on the chart here?--Mαuri’96...over the Borderline23:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Recorded Music NZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single certification levels 2016

[edit]

Hello meber of the en-Wiki. Im working for the german part of Wikipedia. We had a lil discussion about the new certification levels in NZ. This link [1] says, that the singles has some new certification levels, but 15.500 sounds a bit weird, I think it should mean 15.000 for single gold. But the nxt question, when has this been introduced? Can someone help me? ChrisHardy (talk) 16:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Recorded Music NZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Recorded Music NZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]