This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Do you think maybe we should add a section about how dangerous this command is? Running this would basically destroy the directory structure, even if nothing is wrong with the disk. There have been several 3rd party utilities just to recover (pun intended) from accidental running of this command. NiQ (talk) 06:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have this on the article: "The range of circumstances in which recover was genuinely useful was quite limited, and well-meaning DOS users sometimes created havoc by running recover under the misconception that it was a file undelete utility." I don't think it's much of a threat now (very few people are still running bare DOS). By the way, whatever you were trying to do with the templates, don't do it in that way... AnonMoos (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
