Talk:Resurrection of the Daleks

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

"Erroneous" companion omissions

Did the production team actually say that Kamelion and the second K-9 were accidental omissions? Leela was, but Kamelion had barely been in more than one story and they may well have decided that showing two slightly different K-9s would be silly. Are we using erroneous in the sense that they meant to include a companion and forgot (as with Leela), or in the more POV sense that we think those should have been there but they weren't? --Whouk (talk) 23:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode breaks

I have added the 'long' episode break. Is there any way to use a dotted line to show where 'short' episodes 1 & 3 ended? --Jawr256 09:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that's possible. I added a note to show where the four-part breaks were designed to go, but not sure if that's entirely successful. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 09:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We could try something like this:

—Wh o uk (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea --Jawr256 07:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to complicate things even further an early edit of the four part version was sold overseas, minus music & sound effects on some episodes but also with an additional scene in the short part two and the cliffhanger not at the point where Stein reveals he's a Dalek agent but a few seconds later as the Daleks surround the Doctor. But I think the BBC Video & DVD releases use what is the "final" version before the compliation was made. Timrollpickering 09:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Guests

As this was before leslie grantham became famous, does he really count as a special guest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.111.211 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Body Count

Firstly I can't find any media reports on the body count being notably high. Secondly The Terminator has an on-screen body count of 28.^[1] Thus unless someone can rustle up some media or other noteworthy analysis of what constitutes a high body count (40-odd humans lasered or shot with magic bullets that produce no blood is more note-worthy than some other count somewhere else...?) then I propose this section regarding The Terminator be deleted, and we leave the reference in the production notes section that gives the accurate body count. Finally I find this body count thing quite irrelevent, I don't see Star Wars being critisied for entire planets being blown up on screen, yet 20-odd Daleks is notable? ;-) --Ant (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/trivia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Resurrection of the Daleks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130110084344/http://www.dwfiles.com/ to http://www.dwfiles.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/trivia

[1]