Jump to content

Talk:Revival of Kalarippayattu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal

[edit]

The revival topic is simply not big enough to justify it having a seperate article, the info is good but if should be included in the main article. --Nate1481(t/c) 08:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad idea, since for a person new to this martial art, the article Revival of Kalarippayattu would not be of sepcific concern, and shall remain as an extra feature; hence it should be kept separate from the encyclopedic article about the martial art, Kalarippayattu, though it can be developed further. Merger to the main article:NO! (Ekabhishek (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I think that 'revival' does not deserve to be a new article, it should mention as a seperate section in the main article. --Avinesh  T  08:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main article already has all the info from the revival article. They've pretty much been merged already, just delete the latter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.18.181 (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had forgotten this, going to merge/redirect later this week unless there are objections. --Nate1481 12:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After going through the section i feel that both can be merged after some minor editing..Raamah (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]