Talk:Revue des deux Mondes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled

A first step at improving this would be to work in material translated from the corresponding French Wikipedia article.--Wetman (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

First link "Revue des Deux Mondes (Corporate history in English)" ---> broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:907B:1414:EC4A:6DF6 (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Revue des deux Mondes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091016121701/http://www.revuedesdeuxmondes.fr/home/english.php to http://www.revuedesdeuxmondes.fr/home/english.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason not to move to Revue des Deux Mondes?

Hello,

Is there any reason why the title of this article doesn't have a cap to "deux"? The name in french is Revue des Deux Mondes, which is currently a redirect to the current page in wp:en. It should be the contrary.

Regards, --Daehan (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Error

In this article in the “History” section, it says that Charles Buloz edited the magazine from 1831 to 1877. Then in the “Chief Editors” section it says the Charles Buloz was editor from 1878 to 1893. Additionally, it says that François’s Buloz was editor from 1831 to 1877, and also reportedly the first editor until Charles Buloz bought it. I don’t know enough about the topic to say which of these timelines is correct, but there is obviously some error here. 129.2.180.102 (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]