This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
A fact from Richard Phipson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This page should not be speedy deleted because Phipson was a significant local architect whose work is widely covered in works on Suffolk churches... --Johnbod (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think with the addition of the references, I might have self-reverted my speedy nomination had I come back in time to do so. I see no reason, however, to consider http://www.suffolkchurches.co.uk to be a reliable source, though the books listed on that site's first page as its reference sources may well be. I'm about to have to log off for the day or I'd try to help chase down some reliable sources. Best wishes and good luck, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You know, you may read this version as making no claim to notability, but you don't have to. (BTW, not having reliable sources is not a valid reason for CSD tagging.) You might consider "diocesan architect" and "a number of churches" as making some claim to notability. At any rate, even if you can justifiably click on CSD-A7 you don't have to do it. The next stop for this article is the front page. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
