This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
@Lazz R: Please stop edit warring. We Got This Covered, EDMSauce, Noiseporn, Raver Mag, Nest HQ, Raver Rafting and PromonewsTV are either blogs or trivial websites, and should never be used as reliable sources. Regardless, none of the sources have covered the song in significant detail. Merely charting in two countries does not establish notability. Hayman30 (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Hayman30: i mean Billboard, Dancing Astronaut, Junkee Media and Vice Media are all well estiblished websites and reliable sources. the dispute mentioned in the article brought the song to light with the sources publishing work independent to the artist and label, i really do not see what's wrong with this being a standalone article. I don't understand why you want this specific article redirected so bad, as opposed to say, "Twinbow". Which has much less references and general content Lazz_R 16:35, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
