Talk:Roger Federer/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am citing item 3 in the Immediate failures because when I casually looked at the page I noticed multiple {{citation needed}} tags which unless I am very mistaken would automatically fail this article if it as being reviewed as a GA and there for it means that the article currently does not meet GA standard. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through and added references to replace 67 of the 69 {{citation needed}} tags, so there are just two left, which I couldn't immediately source, but I'll have another look tomorrow, and a sentence or two may need to be removed in those cases. (I've only been looking at references and not looking at other GA criteria as that's the quick fail issue.) Cheers. Ym2X (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work.--Wolbo (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed the last two. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 11:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am closing this as a pass. I am by no means experienced at GA review so if a more experienced editor comes along and finds this and realises I have messed up then please forgive me. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]