Talk:Romani media

Problems

this article has inline external links, and few references. it was started by an editor, now banned, shortly after a similar article on the Roma virtual network was deleted. a more recent editor has added links to their website, as a source for a Roma resource he created. that is a clear conflict of interest, which can be fixed by adding references other than ones own. I would encourage anyone adding info to this article to start with effective sourcing of the material already here. nobody doubts that these things exist, we just need some clearn indication of notability, even if just print material from the Roma community. note: i have not removed any material, preferring to give more knowledgeable people (i am not Roma nor am i associated with any of these resources) a chance to improve it. and i of course recognize the problem of establishing notability for organizations and people traditionally discriminated against and institutionally marginalized. I will NOT participate in the indirect censorship of the Roma people. Lets just get this in better shape.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

@Mercurywoodrose looks like articles can remain mess for a decade even on EN Wikipedia if in niche. I did most basic and quick technical clean up, but this still needs work. -- Zblace (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)