This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This information is misleading and inaccurate based on the NWT Supreme Court decision was overturned by the NWT Court of Appeal in 2008 NWTCA 04, which has been heard but a decision not rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Copy Editor (talk) 04:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer to use the term "replacement workers" over "strikebreakers" as the latter has a negative connotation to it (as recognized by [LabourWatch.com]. In addition, the Courts prefer the use of the term "replacement worker" as evidenced by Fullowka v. Royal OAk Ventures Inc. (2008 NWTCA). Canadian Copy Editor (talk) 05:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's still a corporatism, i.e. a euphemism and strikebreaker is the most common usage; ("scab" is the truly negative term); language preferred by the courts is not most common usage....note my inline comment about the riot squad of 300 Pinkerton's that led an assault on the mine, that should be in here, must be press copy online about it somewhere; I remember watching the footage clear as a bell.Skookum1 (talk) 12:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
