Talk:Rugoconites

Animals Low‑importance

Rugoconites is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lorenzinites rarus

Would it be okay if I would have the permission to include the following line?

...But, since a synonym of this genus is "Lorenzinities" , there might be three species because there exists a species called Lorenzinites rarus , which is though to actually be a cnidarian , or either a misshapen fossil specimen of a rugoconites"

I am including this line because I want to also say that Lorenzinities is a synonym for the genus , and that the species L. rarus is part of the Lorenzinities group , but , doesn't share any similarities with both R. enigmaticus or R. tenuirugosus. And that it might actually be a Cnidarian Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 09:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosus[reply]

This sounds like WP:OR, which is not unacceptable here. Please cite a reliable source on this page first and quote the text upon which you might base any such edit upon. I no longer have much confidence in your abilities to understand and differentiate published expert opinion by scientists from your own amateur sleuthing and guesswork. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]