Talk:SISMI

Military history: Intelligence Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force

Italy B‑class Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Espionage Low‑importance

	SISMI is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

If you doubt the veracity of an article, there are other ways to complain! Abeg92 01:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping to conclusions

Allow me a critic on this article. It seems to be based on journalist-related leftist stories: whereas there's still controversy about some happenings, you seem to be sure of what you wrote!

A couple of examples: Nicola Calipari was not shot for a "communication breakdown". SISMI officers insisted that the Americans did know well of the incoming arrival of the italian's car at Baghdad airport. Italy still blames (and has issued an arrest warrant) the rush and inexperience of Mario Lozano, who fired at the car without respecting engagement rules. The americans' inquiry on this case tried to blame the car's excessive speed on the checkpoint approach: this conclusion was utterly and sharply refused by Italy, and our envoys did not sign it.

Second example: Nicolò Pollari, the now former head of SISMI (which very recently underwent a general reorganization of the management) is in this article accused of not knowing the procedure of communication with the CIA, bypassing it and communicating with Dick Cheney straightaway. This is frankly difficult to believe, after 40 years of Gladio and strict cooperation with CIA during the Cold War. More, you're quick to accuse SISMI of co-responsibility in the Abu Omar "extraordinary rendition" together with the CIA (which is quite possible), but that raises a contradiction: how could they cooperate like that if they didn't have a clue how to communicate properly with the CIA? Did they get in touch with Dick Cheney again? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.140.17.106 (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]