Talk:Savita Bhabhi

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

India: Literature / Women & gender Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian women and gender issues workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in March 2017.

Comics: World Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by World comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability?

It would be helpful if somebody could explain what exactly need to be done to prove notability. I have added enough third party refs to the article. Travelsalesman (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have given refs from telegraph, Times of india, ANI etc. Also few refs were deleted in talk page, if any admin could help. regards, Travelsalesman (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to admin for talkpage restore, i could get back my Independent ref. I think article has enough notability, anybody may please point out any lapse here. Regards! Travelsalesman (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 11:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I completely agree that Savita Bhabhi is notable, even though she is fictitious. She is already stirring up a lot of discussion. If Bollywood puts her in a movie, it will be an earthshaking event! For WP precedents, see Fritz the Cat (film), Heavy Traffic, South Park, The Simpsons, Zap Comix, and even Lady Chatterley's Lover. India may be in roughly the same place that the U.K. and U.S. where in when this work by D.H. Lawrence was banned. Today there's no question about LCL deserving an article, but D.H. Lawrence was widely belittled for writing it. LADave (talk) 05:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Massive deletions, no explanation

I contributed a section on "cultural context" because I thought readers coming from outside South Asia would not understand the meaning of the word "bhabhi" in traditional extended families or how the word is sexualized in that context and in the larger culture where extended families are no longer always a given. "Defender of Torch" deleted the entire section on 20 December 2009 at 16:58 with no discussion and no explanation except a "NPOV" notation. While I accept that this article is a controversial area, Wikipedia policy is this:

"When you find a passage in an article that you find is biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. If that is not easily possible, and you disagree with a point of view expressed in an article, don't just delete it. Rather, balance it with what you think is neutral."

I propose restoring the deleted text and welcome discussion on this point. 76.169.50.90 (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SYN. --Defender of torch (talk) 14:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've read WP:SYN. Perhaps you could help me by identifying which part of my section on "Cultural Context" you decided was "original research". After all, it's mostly quotations from other sources. I'm also curious why you resorted to wholesale deletion. I would have thought a discussion in the talk section should have at least been a preliminary. LADave (talk) 04:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion at Talk:Bhabhi. Hope you will participate. LADave (talk) 11:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kirtu?

SB has since moved to kirtu.com, does anyone have any background info on this? --MK 11:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savita in tution teacher episode.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Savita in tution teacher episode.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by deletion

On 18 December 122.176.246.252 deleted a list of Savita Bhabhi episodes without the expected courtesy of discussion or consensus. I have undone this change and invite discussion.

I note that Wikipedia has many lists of episodes of series productions in popular culture. Here is just a sample:

LADave (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder that Wikipedia is not censored

While you may find the article personally offensive, you have the option of not reading it. For better or worse, it has already been up for deletion and the community's consensus was to keep it. Feel free to improve the article but do not remove referenced material without discussing it here first. Ifnord (talk) 17:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ifnord: That seems some sort of vandalism. If it persists, I will request for RFPP since it seems to be coming from a IP. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kaushal

Kaushal 2402:8100:2681:A55D:0:46:93F3:7801 (talk) 04:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]