Jump to content

Talk:Schweigt stille, plaudert nicht, BWV 211

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This libretto text is on several websites, and was presumably copied from one of them. Copyright in the translation may therefore be dubious. Mark1 12:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly sure the translation is PD, its been around since before 1923 judging from the scores I've come across. I transwikied it out to Wikisource, though. I felt the WP article would be better off having a synopsis of each movement, and linked to the WS page for anyone interested in reading the full libretto. Mister Senseless (Speak - Contributions) 21:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 December 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus primarily due to a lack of participation. Jenks24 (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Schweigt stille, plaudert nicht, BWV 211Coffee Cantata – I don't see a particular downside applying WP:USEENGLISH here: in English the English name is probably more recognizable and easier to remember than its German incipit and/or the BWV number. There is none of the five WP:CRITERIA that loses anything here, and several that are better off (recognizability, conciseness). True, there is the WP:MUSICSERIES aspect, but several compositions in the original cantata range of BWV numbers deviate from the "German name, BWV number" series format (the Easter Oratorio being one of them) -- Francis Schonken (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)--Relisted. Tiggerjay (talk) 02:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Schweigt stille, plaudert nicht, BWV 211. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]