Jump to content

Talk:Scott Johnson (cartoonist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cites

[edit]

Untitled

[edit]

Scott Johnson has a wikipedia page now? WTF? *whine* *whine* *whine*. Seriously though, some of the cites seem like overkill. FOUR for the Geeks poster? Isn't 1 or 2 enough? 24.113.86.23 (talk) 01:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First there were not enough citations. Now they "seem like overkill"? Curtgunz (talk) 07:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

photo

[edit]

Improving this Article

[edit]
  • I'm not terribly experienced as a Wikipedia editor, but I think this article can be improved. There's also some outdated information in here that could stand to be updated/removed (for example: Curt Schilling is no longer a member of alea iacta est, although Tom Merritt of CNET is now.)
  • Is there someone willing to help out with this who is well versed in Enclyclopedic writing syle and Wikipedia's citation requirements? Scott's certainly a noteworthy subject, and I'd hate to see his article deleted (again).--20.132.68.134 (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm a fan of Scott Johnson's work. I tried to make the content a little more enclyclopedic in nature, add a few sources, and organize the page into sub-sections. There's still room to flesh out the article, but this framework might be helpful to others who wish to contribute. --FloridaJosh (talk) 03:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed link in the beginning of the article from the old Frog Pants Studio link hosted on the MEL site, to the newer one, which is actually a standalone Frog Pants Studio site. --Boonie45 (talk) 16:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Instance: The Old Republic Edition

[edit]

I would say the two are separate. Add them both separately and unambiguously. Explain if (you feel it) necessary. - Bjørnar Munkerud, December 2012

Infobox

[edit]

Switched to {{Infobox person}}, because {{Infobox presenter}} didn't seem to fit the podcast broadcasting method, and also emitted a spurious word "module" at the bottom of the infobox. --Lexein (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]