Talk:Service star

Military history: Culture / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is there any insight as to why DANFS would invariably use the term "battle star" instead of "service star"? Stan 20:11, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that when service stars are issued to entire ships, they are called battle stars. I.e., "that ship recieved five battle stars". But, when worn by a person on ana ctual ribbon, they would be service stars ("he has the Southwest Service Medal with two service stars"). According to award and decoration regs, the "offical" name is service star but service stars are called by a variety of names. -Husnock 22:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Service vs. Award Star

September 01, 2005 Is there a difference between a Service star and an award star? They appear to be referring to the identical thing. Anyone able to clear this up and/or fix? -unsigned anon user

Award Stars are for meritorious medals issued by the Navy such as the Navy Achievement Medal. Service stars are for service medals and ribbons, such as the Sea Service Deployment Ribbon. Award stars are only issued by the Department of the Navy whereas, for other services, oak leaf clusters are issued. -Husnock 03:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Battle Stars & Service Star

Unfortunatelt there is a mass of confusion regarding Battle Stars and Service Stars. Part of this is caused by the different award terminology used by the Army and Navy. In some instances, an Army Battle Star is the same as a Navy Service Star and simple signifies the awarding of an additional ribbon or medal that it is worn on. (ie. A National Defense Medal with one star means the person was awarded two National Defense Medals)

However, as far as the Global War On Terrorism Expeditionary Medal is concerned, the Battle Stars and Service Stars ARE NOT THE SAME THING! Yet thousands of individuals, and this Wiki article, fail to recognize the difference.

As a Wiki rookie, what needs to be done to ammend this article?

REFERENCE: MARADMIN 129/04 8. DEVICES: ONLY ONE AWARD OF THIS MEDAL MAY BE AUTHORIZED FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL, THEREFORE, NO DEVICES (SERVICE STARS) ARE AUTHORIZED.

  A.  BATTLE STARS MAY BE APPLICABLE FOR PERSONNEL WHO WERE ENGAGED IN ACTUAL COMBAT AGAINST THE ENEMY UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVING GRAVE DANGER OF DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY FROM ENEMY ACTION.

NAVADMIN 090/04 6. BATTLE STARS. BATTLE STARS MAY BE APPLICABLE FOR PERSONNEL WHO WERE ENGAGED IN ACTUAL COMBAT AGAINST THE ENEMY AND UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVING GRAVE DANGER OF DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY FROM ENEMY ACTION.

(Air Force) 252010Z MAY 04 (A) BATTLE STARS MAY BE AUTHORIZED FOR WEAR ON THE GWOT EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL BY PERSONNEL WHO WERE ENGAGED IN ACTUAL COMBAT AGAINST THE ENEMY UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVING GRAVE DANGER OF DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY FROM ENEMY ACTION.

PUBLISHED ARTICLES: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2004/n02262004_200402264.html Defense Department Introduces Global War on Terrorism Medals American Forces Press Service "Individuals engaged in actual combat may be eligible for battle stars on the expeditionary medal."

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/airforcemedals/a/AFGWOT.htm Air Force Approves Wear of GWOT Expeditionary Medal "There are no service stars or other devices authorized; however, battle stars may be authorized for servicemembers who engaged in actual combat."

http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2004/nr20040226-1021.html DoD Announces Criteria for Global War on Terrorism Medals "Battle Stars for the expeditionary and service medal, if warranted, may be applicable for personnel who were engaged in actual combat against the enemy and under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action." ... "Only one award of the expeditionary medal and service medal may be authorized for any individual; therefore, no service stars are prescribed."

https://awards.navy.mil Navy Department Awards Web Service (NDAWS) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Question: GWOTEM: What is a Battle Star? Answer: A battle star is the small bronze star that is worn on the GWOTEM to denote the number of combat operations in which an individual has participated. It is intended for personnel who were engaged in actual combat against the enemy and under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action. Commanding Officers of units who feel their unit qualifies for the battle star must request, in writing, approval for their unit to wear a battle star.

Removing globalize tag

unless someone can give me an example of battlestars outside of the U.S., I will take off the globalize tag. Buggie111 (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5/16 inch bronze Star?

"In the case of 5/16 inch stars for USN, USMC and USCG decorations, a gold star is worn for an additional award of the same decoration and a silver star is worn in lieu of five bronze stars."

This sentence refers to 5/16 inch stars, so it should read "a silver star is worn in lieu of five gold stars.". There is no 5/16 inch bronze star — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.251.239.221 (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle stars on which ribbon?

In the Ed Koch article, it say he received "two battle stars". Which ribbon are they supposed to be worn on? He received:

European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal
National Defense Service Medal
World War II Victory Medal

the first two of which are listed at Service star § Awards (which oddly includes World War I Victory Medal but not World War II Victory Medal). Going with the term "battle star" as being related to actual battles, I chose to put them on the EAME ribbon in the article, but it's really just a guess. Any clues? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 15:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that the service stars, corresponding to either campaigns or battles, should go on his EAME campaign medal. You can have stars on the NDSM as well, but only if one serves during multiple eligiblity periods. FWIW, based on the years of service listed, it does not appear as though Mr. Koch is eligible for the NDSM. Highspeed (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, in all likelihood he was not awarded the NDSM. There are scenarios, however, in which it could have happened. For example, the source citation just says "combat infantryman with rank of sergeant, 1943-1946". Theoretically, he could have been honorably discharged from the active component in 1946 and gone into the reserves, then sometime during 1950-1953, he came on active duty for some reason or another (not to be deployed to Korea; maybe he just did two weeks of active duty for annual training). It's not likely, but it's possible. The way the criteria for the NDSM were constructed, anyone on active duty in the time period specified, even for very short duration, qualify for the medal. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete

In this article, word "obsolete" is used incorrectly. It can mean "of a kind or style no longer current", but the style of these stars has not changed, or it can mean "no longer used because something newer exists", but the stars awarded for the earlier campaigns are still in use. The winners of these earlier awards, living or dead, are still currently using them. They have not been awarded newer stars, which would make their older ones obsolete, and neither time, nor death, removes nor ends the award of a military honor. Nick Beeson (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Service star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]