Jump to content

Talk:Seth P. Waxman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

relation

[edit]

Does he have any relation to Henry Waxman? WooyiTalk to me? 00:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No.

B.?

[edit]

Why does Seth B. Waxman (by which he is cited in the text of the majority decision in Boumediene v. Bush) redirect here? Is it a mistake in the decision? Does he also go by a different middle name? - dcljr (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens United vs. FEC

[edit]

In light of Seth P. Waxman's contributions to the Citizens United vs. FEC Case, shouldn't it be included in this article?

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 (2010) is a landmark U.S. constitutional law, campaign finance, and corporate law case dealing with regulation of political campaign spending by organizations.

...

Former Bush Solicitor General Ted Olson and First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams argued for Citizens United, and former Clinton Solicitor General Seth Waxman defended the statute on behalf of various supporters.[1] Legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky called it "one of the most important First Amendment cases in years".[2]

Matthew J. Long -Talk- 18:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Hillary: The Oral Argument". The Washington Post.
  2. ^ Liptak, Adam (2009-08-06). "Sotomayor Faces Heavy Workload of Complex Cases". The New York Times.