Talk:Sheffield Digital Campus

Sheffield Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Sheffield Digital Campus is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone

The wording seems a bit biased and overly descriptive. Lex Kitten 11:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point about tone, but wikification? L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 11:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the reply.

Here's an example of what I mean about the tone- "Sheffield's digital and creative business sectors are already a fast-growing sector, with the CIQ really pushing for an increase in the sector"

It just sounds a wee bit like an add, if you know what I mean. Though I can see it's hard to talk about a future project without using that kind of language.

In terms of wikification, I think the article needs more structure. Like, maybe a section on Sheffield's background, and a section on the design of the digital campus, or something? I think that will make the article easier to read, and also help it read less like an ad. Lex Kitten 23:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the design should be no problem, though how I'll get an image I don't know (I've had this problem is articles like NRQ, St Paul's Tower etc - they're all copyrighted). As for Sheffield's background, see Sheffield or History of Sheffield. Both featured articles! L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 08:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]