Jump to content

Talk:Sherpa (association)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adding info about Sherpa / Draft Page

[edit]

I would like to add information about Sherpa and cases link to the NGO, however as I have a conflict of interest (working for the charity) - could it be possible to review information and references I would like to add before publishing? Should I create a draft page and share it here? Many thanks DorineSherpa (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add the information below to the page (references and link will be added properly).

Request edit
== Illicit financial flows and Predation practices on resources ==
=== Corruption ===
==== Sarkozy and others ====
Since 2011, Sherpa has denounced the problematic nature of economic relations between France and Gaddafi’s Libyan regime (ref to include: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/france-libya-case-sarkozys-campaign-transnational-grand-corruption). Sherpa first filed a complaint against Amesys­­­ (ref to include:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2039175/Gadaffi-evading-capture-Mercedes-4x4-given-Nicolas-Sarkozy.html) regarding the selling of monitoring equipment to the Libyan government. In February 20211, Sherpa filed a second complaint against several members of the Gaddafi clan (ref to include: https://jp.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-55168920110225) to investigate the origin of their assets held in France. Following Mediapart’s revelations during the Sarkozy-Gaddafi affair, a judicial investigation was opened in April 2013 (ref to include: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/16/former-french-president-sarkozy-charged-over-libyan-financing). In June 2013, Sherpa filed a civil action (ref to include: https://www.marie-dose-avocat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/sherpa-afp-sarkozy-campagne-bourdon-marie-dose-avocat-300913.pdf). In addition, the case exposed acts of corruption linked to the French company Airbus. They were settled by a Judicial Convention of Public Interest (CJIP), the French equivalent of a criminal transaction, concluded between the company and the Parquet national financier (ref to include: https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20221201-aviation-giant-airbus-settles-%E2%82%AC16-million-fine-to-halt-corruption-investigation). This agreement was subsequently denounced by Sherpa as “another illustration of the longstanding tendency to resort to negotiated justice in corruption” (ref to include: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/sarkozy-libya-airbus-corruption-cases-face-negotiated-justice).
==== Dassault – Rafales deal ====
Following a complaint to the Parquet national financier and after more revelation from Mediapart (ref to include: https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/160123/rafale-papers-how-frances-anti-corruption-agency-covered-aviation-firm-dassault) of suspicions of political obstructions to investigate one of french biggest defense company Sherpa filed a civil complaint in April2021 requesting a judicial investigation into the sale of 36 combat aircraft by Dassault Aviation to India in 2016 (ref to include: https://theprint.in/defence/french-ngo-files-corruption-complaint-against-rafale-deal/153953/ and https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/interview/strong-case-for-investigating-rafale-deal-in-france-says-lawyer-for-complainant-asso-sherpa). As a result of Sherpa complaint, a judicial investigation was opened in July 2021 (ref to include:https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/020721/rafale-papers-france-opens-judicial-probe-fighter-deal-india-new-revelations-emerge?_locale=en).
=== Ill-gotten gains ===
==== French asset’s restitution mechanism ====
In the wake of its fight against ill-gotten gains, Sherpa advocated actively for the ill-gotten gains restitution mechanism adopted by France in July 2021 (ref to include: https://www.u4.no/blog/the-ill-gotten-gains-french-model-for-restitution and https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/france-adopts-bill-allowing-return-of-ill-gotten-assets/2162701).
==== Ill-gotten gains - Equatorial Guinea – Gabon – Congo ====
In March 2007, Sherpa together with Survie and the Congolese Diaspora Federation filed an ill-gotten gains complaint against 5 heads of African governments, including Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, Denis Sassou Nguesso, and Omar Bongo (ref to include : https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/14940-france-upholds-graft-ruling-against-equatorial-guinea-s-vp and https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/120215/ill-gotten-gains-french-police-found-congo-ruling-clans-penthouse?_locale=en&onglet=full and https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/06/france-africa-autocrats-corruption-inquiry). Following Sherpa complaint, after 15 years of legal battle, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue was convicted by the French justice on 28th July 2021 for the illegal constitution of a luxurious estate (ref: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210728-french-court-to-rule-on-illegal-assets-of-e-guinea-president-son). In the case of Omar Bongo, several members of the Bongo family were indicted in 2022 (ref: https://www.africanews.com/2022/07/29/france-charges-5-more-children-of-ex-gabonese-leader-bongo-over-ill-gotten-assets/).
==== Ill-gotten gains - Syria ====
In July 2011, Sherpa and Transparency International France filed a complaint targeting the movable and immovable properties held in France by Riffat al-Assad, uncle of Bashar al-Assad, and some twenty people (ref: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-syria-idUSTRE76P4XW20110726 and https://www.asso-sherpa.org/ill-gotten-gains-in-syria-rifaat-al-assad). This complaint was first dismissed, but two new civil actions were filed by the NGO in September 2013 and April 2014 against Rifaat al-Assad for “concealment of stolen assets, corruption, and aggravated money laundering by organized groups” (ref: https://uncaccoalition.org/ill-gotten-gains-the-rifaat-al-assad-case-interview-with-laura-rousseau-sherpa/). As a result of Sherpa and Transparency International work, Rifaat al-Assad was indicted in June 2016 (ref:https://www.lemonde.fr/syrie/article/2016/06/28/rifaat-al-assad-un-proche-du-president-syrien-mis-en-examen-a-paris_4959691_1618247.html). Rifaat Al-Assad was sentenced to 4 years of prison and ordered to forfeit his French real estate assets worth an estimated 90 million euros in December 2019. This sentence was confirmed by the Court of Appeal of Paris in June 2021 (ref:https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210909-french-court-sentences-rifaat-al-assad-bashar-s-uncle-to-4-years-in-prison-for-financial-crime) and by the Court of Cassation on September 7, 2022 (ref: https://www.samaaenglish.tv/news/40016557) . Sherpa further denounced to conditions that allowed Rifaat al Asad to flee to Syria and therefore avoid his conviction and imprisonment(ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/rifaat-al-assad-sentenced-in-france-for-his-ill-gotten-gains-allegedly-fled-to-syria).
=== Tax havens and money laundering ===
==== Ill-gotten gains - Lebanon ====
Sherpa and the Collective of Victims of Fraudulent and Criminal Practices in Lebanon filed a complaint against X in April 2021 alleging money laundering and exposing suspicious circumstances involving the acquisition of luxury real estate on French territory by Lebanese officials (ref: https://today.lorientlejour.com/article/1261317/victims-of-financial-collapse-in-lebanon-resort-to-the-french-courts.html). In June 2021, the Parquet National Financier opened an investigation that specifically targeted Riad Salamé, the governor of the Banque du Liban (ref: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20210606-france-opens-probe-into-personal-wealth-of-lebanon-s-central-bank-chief). A similar complaint was also filed with the Luxembourg public prosecutor because the case involved complex arrangements involving Luxembourg-based entities, and lead to the opening of an investigation on December 22 (ref: https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/15490-luxembourg-opens-criminal-case-into-lebanon-s-central-bank-governor).
==== BNP Paribas, Société Générale, Natixis, CIC, Rivage Investment, Malta ====
Daphne Caruana Galizia, a Maltese journalist, was murdered in October 2017 while investigating a corruption scandal (ref: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63261744). The Maltese police investigation revealed that Yorgen Fenech, director and shareholder of the company Electrogas, was suspected of being the mastermind behind the murder (ref: https://forbiddenstories.org/the-unswept-corners-of-daphnes-murder/). In September 2020, Sherpa and the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation requested the Parquet national financier to open an investigation into BNP Paribas, Société Générale, Natixis, CIC and Rivage Investment involving a loan agreement to Electrogas (ref: https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/zero-tolerance-for-corruption-ngo-sherpa.825022, and https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/france-criminal-complaint-filed-against-four-banks-and-one-investment-fund-for-complicity-in-corrupt-deal-linked-to-murder-of-journalist-in-2017/ and https://www.daphne.foundation/en/2020/10/05/french-banks).
== Protecting Civic Space ==
=== Protecting Whistle-blowers and Fighting SLAPP ===
In 2018, Sherpa co-founded with other organisations la Maison des Lanceurs d’Alerte (MLA) (ref: https://mlalerte.org/les-organisations-membres-de-la-maison-des-lanceurs-dalerte/), which provides daily support to whistle-blowers, and carries out actions to raise awareness and mobilise both political decision-makers and public opinion (ref: https://whistleblowingnetwork.org/Membership/Our-Members/Members/Maison-des-Lanceurs-d-alerte).
The NGO is also involved in the fight against Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which are lawsuits used by companies to threaten and harass human rights defenders, journalists, activists, NGOs, whistle-blowers, and other actors committed to denouncing their harmful practices (ref:https://whistleblowingnetwork.org/Our-Work/Spotlight/Stories/Ending-Gag-Lawsuits-in-Europe). Sherpa is an active member of the Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE) created in 2021 (ref:https://www.the-case.eu/) as a reaction to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s murder. This coalition includes more than 30 associations and calls for the adoption of an EU directive against SLAPPs (ref: https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/lawmakers-to-start-work-on-anti-slapp-stakeholders-warn-just-first-step/).
=== Corporate opacity and Business secrecy ===
Sherpa is actively advocating for the consecration and protection of a right of access to corporate information, to promote further transparency: the NGO denounced specifically the extensive use of business secrecy, tax secrecy, and banking secrecy which contributes to the overall opacity of the industry. In 2018, Sherpa together with journalists and other organisations called for the rejection of the transposition of a European directive allowing business secrecy (ref: https://stoptradesecrets.eu/ and https://informernestpasundelit.org/category/secret-des-affaires/)
=== Facilitating legal action by associations ===
Sherpa also works to identify and fight threats faced by NGOs that limit their actions in the legal field (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/decryptage-la-recevabilite-de-laction-associative-devant-les-juridictions-penales-en-question). Additionally, Sherpa has been denouncing the obstacles that French associations face in obtaining the ministerial approvals necessary to take legal actions in corruption cases (ref: https://blogs.mediapart.fr/association-sherpa/blog/210319/qui-veut-empecher-sherpa-dagir-contre-la-corruption and https://www.politis.fr/articles/2021/01/lutte-contre-la-corruption-priere-de-ne-pas-deranger-42735/)
== Compelling multinationals to respect human and environmental rights==
=== Civil Liability of Parent Companies ===
==== Duty of vigilance ====
Sherpa was a key player in the adoption of the 2017 law on the corporate duty of vigilance : It requires French companies to establish, publish and effectively implement adapted measures to identify risks and prevent severe human rights abuses, fundamental freedoms, the health and safety of individuals, and the environment (ref: https://vigilance-plan.org/the-law/,and https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-and-human-rights-journal/article/french-law-on-duty-of-care-a-historic-step-towards-making-globalization-work-for-all/7C85F4E2B2F7DD1E1397FC8EFCFE9BDD, and https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/france-leads-eu-on-duty-of-care-requirements-for-multinationals/, and https://www.business-humanrights.org/fr/blog/what-lessons-does-frances-duty-of-vigilance-law-have-for-other-national-initiatives/). Following the adoption of the law, Sherpa and CCFD Terre Solidaire published the duty of vigilance radar (ref: https://www.business-humanrights.org/fr/derni%C3%A8res-actualit%C3%A9s/sherpa-releases-new-guidance-legal-analysis-on-french-duty-of-vigilance-law/). Since the adoption of the French law, Sherpa is contributing to discussions around a futur european law (ref: https://parisgoodfashion.fr/en/news/duty-of-care-european-parliament-calls-for-tighter-supervision-of-companies-152/ and https://www.asso-sherpa.org/focus-on-can-the-proposed-european-directive-on-the-duty-of-vigilance-close-the-corporate-accountability-gap).
Sherpa is a member of the Citizen’s Forum for Corporate Social Responsibility (ref: http://forumcitoyenpourlarse.org/le-fcrse/liste-membres/) and represents it within the European Coalition for Corporate Justice, a coalition of civil society organisations from all over Europe working on business and human rights, corporate accountability, and corporate social responsibility (ref: https://corporatejustice.org/members/).
==== Casino / Yves Rocher / Téléperformance ====
In 2019, following a report by UNI Global Union, Sherpa and the union federation put the company Téléperformance on notice to comply with its duty of vigilance regarding human rights (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/sherpa-and-uni-global-union-send-formal-notice-to-teleperformance-calling-on-the-world-leader-in-call-centers-to-strengthen-workers-rights-2) .
In March 2021, Sherpa, alongside several Brazilian and Colombian indigenous peoples’ organisations (COIAB, CPT, FEIPA, FEPOIMT et OPIAC), and international NGOs (Canopée, Envol Vert, France Nature Environnement, Mighty Earth, Notre Affaire à Tous) sued the Casino group under the duty of vigilance law (ref: https://www.rfi.fr/en/business/20210304-french-supermarket-giant-casino-sued-over-links-to-amazon-deforestation-south-america-environment-indigenous-people-economy). The company was accused of sourcing from beef-producing farms at risk of deforestation of the Amazon rainforest, illegal land grabbing of indigenous territories, and forced labour.
In March 2022, Sherpa, Actionaid, the Turkish syndicate Petrol-Is, and 34 former employees of the Turkish subsidiary sued Yves Rocher group for failing to comply with its duty of vigilance regarding the freedom to join a union and workers’ fundamental rights. (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/yves-rocher-case-turkey and https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/turkey-yves-rocher-the-french-cosmetics-company-facing-court-proceedings-for-failure-to-ensure-workers-rights-and-trade-union-rights/)
=== Environnement ===
==== TotalEnergies ====
In January 2020, Sherpa, alongside 14 local authorities, Notre Affaire à Tous, ZEA, Eco Maires, and France Nature Environnement, brought an action against TotalEnergies. Using the law on the duty of vigilance, the coalition requested that the judge order the oil company to take the necessary measures to comply with the objectives of the Paris Agreement (ref:https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrvetter/2020/01/30/this-french-lawsuit-is-making-oil-companies-nervous/). The tribunal first ruled in favour of the NGOs and local authorities in February 2021 by confirming the jurisdiction, rejecting the oil major’s attempt to bring the dispute before the commercial court .Other local authorities joined the judicial procedure in September 2022, including the cities of Paris and New York (ref: https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/paris-new-york-join-climate-litigation-against-totalenergies-2022-09-21/).
==== Perenco ====
In July 2019, Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France filed an action against the French company Perenco S.A. regarding its oil activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The NGOs sought to obtain additional evidence on the relations between Perenco S.A. and companies operating locally in the DRC through the use of a specific legal tool (article 145 of the French Code of Civil Procedure) (ref: https://climate-laws.org/geographies/france/litigation_cases/amis-de-la-terre-and-sherpa-v-perenco).
The Cour of Cassation ruled in favour of Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France in March 2022 (ref: https://www.africabusinessplus.com/en/811414/sherpas-advisers-win-legal-battle-to-access-information-in-case-against-perenco-in-drc/). A complementary claim was then filed in November 2022 by Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France with the support of the NGO Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA-US) requiring Perenco S.A. to remedy harm caused to the environment in Democratic Republic of Congo (ref: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/29/why-environmental-disaster-victims-are-looking-to-european-courts).
=== Corporate Capture ===
Sherpa also seeks to counter the influence strategies of multinationals and corporate capture. The NGO denounces the growing influence of corporations in a number of areas such as: on public opinion, in policy-making and standard setting, as well as on the corporate standards they must meet (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RA_EN_2021_Sherpa.pdf). In 2022, the NGOs published recommendations on the adoption of a harder legal framework on lobbying (ref: https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2022/09/21/lobbying-une-regulation-s-impose-pour-retablir-l-equilibre-du-debat-public-et-faire-primer-l-interet-general_6142555_3232.html) and formulated suggestions seeking to avoid the use of private consultancies in public policy making (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Sherpa-octobre-2022-Pour-une-reponse-legislative-proportionnee-a-lampleur-des-strategies-dinfluence-deployees-par-les-entreprises.pdf).
Sherpa filed two complaints for deceptive business practices against Samsung France in 2013 (ref: https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/france/050719/samsung-faces-charges-france-over-misleading-foreign-labour-claims?_locale=en) and Auchan supermarket in 2015 (ref: https://www.thelocal.fr/20140425/bangladesh-french-retailer-faces-lawsuit-over-disaster). In the Samsung case, the company’s indictment was dismissed in March 2022, on the grounds of lack of admissibility of the NGOs (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/samsung-case-on-deceptive-commercial-practices-grounds-french-supreme-court-confirms-inadmissibility-of-the-csos-claim). The Auchan case followed 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse in light of the labels of the In Extenso brand belonging to the Auchan group found in the rubbles (ref: https://www.newsmax.com/finance/markets/bangladesh-disaster-textile-deaths/2014/04/24/id/567495/). The dismissal of the case was confirmed in December 2022 (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/auchan-bangladesh-fairwashing-case-dismissed)
=== Protecting workers' rights ===
==== Bolloré – Socapalm ====
Sherpa and several associations filed a complaint before the OECD French National Contact Point (NCP) at the end of 2010 regarding the activities of Socapalm - SOCFIN Cameroonian palm plantation company linked to the group Bolloré - concerning social, environmental and land issues denounced by neighbouring communities and workers (ref: https://www.oecdwatch.org/complaint/sherpa-et-al-vs-bollore/).The NCP mediation led to an action plan for Socapalm (ref: https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/tresor-international/pcn-france/circonstance-specifique-groupes-bollore-et-socfin-socapalm-au-cameroun). As the plan remained unexecuted by the company (ref: https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Institutionnel/Niveau3/Pages/bd7a00fc-6949-450b-bc40-aa09ac044ab0/files/30708f1f-c4d6-4916-b3ce-3d4fccd67547), Sherpa and other organisations took Bolloré to court to request for a forced execution of the action plan (ref: https://www.ft.com/content/f6364426-8061-11e9-9935-ad75bb96c849). The case has been ongoing for years despite numerous procedural wins by the associations (ref: https://www.oecdwatch.org/hardening-soft-law-strategic-use-of-the-oecd-guidelines-to-achieve-meaningful-outcomes/).
==== Vinci - Qatar ====
In March 2015, Sherpa filed, against Vinci Construction Grands Projets and the French executives of its Qatari subsidiary a complaint alleging reduction to servitude and forced labor, among other complaints, on construction sites in Qatar (ref: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/26/france-vinci-construction-qatar-forced-labour-claims-2022-world-cup).
Sherpa and the French Comité contre l’Esclavage Moderne (Committee Against Modern Slavery) alongside former Indian and Nepalese construction workers filed a complaint in 2019 (ref: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vinci-qatar-idUSKCN1NR1LF) following a previous dismissal in 2018 (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/vinci-case-qatar). In November 2022, Vinci Construction Grands Projets was indicted for “obtention of services in exchange for remuneration that is clearly unrelated to the importance of the work performed”, “reduction to servitude”, “submission to working and housing conditions incompatible with human dignity” (ref: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/10/football/world-cup-2022-vinci-qatar-spt-intl/index.html).
Following this procedure, Vinci sued Sherpa for defamation and infringement of presumption of innocence (ref: https://www.mindthegap.ngo/harmful-strategies/undermining-defenders-communities/filing-lawsuits-to-intimidate-critics/case-study-slapp-suits-against-sherpa-by-vinci-construction/). Sherpa prevailed on the matter of presumption of innocence (ref: https://www.doctrine.fr/d/CA/Paris/2017/C78E200EDBFC560F8577A). The defamation case is currently on-hold, and should be adjudicated when the investigations that have been ongoing following the complaint are over (ref: https://www.batiactu.com/edito/chantiers-au-qatar-proces-diffamation-vinci-contre-45466.php).
=== International crimes and armed conflicts ===
==== Multinationals involvement in armed conflicts ====
In November 2016, Sherpa, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), and eleven Syrian former employees of Lafarge filed a complaint against the company Lafarge, including its Syrian subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) and former executives (ref: https://apnews.com/article/47f09a48ba304c92a321e77dc9996e03). Lafarge is accused of having transferred up to 13 million euros to various armed groups, including the Islamic State, to continue to maintain its activities in the region. In June 2018, Lafarge SA was charged with complicity in crimes against humanity, financing a terrorist organization, embargo violating an embargo”, and endangering the lives of its Syrian employees (ref: https://www.novethic.com/csr/isr-rse/lafarge-charged-with-complicity-in-crimes-against-humanity-146046.html). Several former executives were also charged (ref: https://syriadirect.org/french-multinational-company-lafarge-to-face-charges-of-complicity-in-crimes-against-humanity-a-crack-in-corporate-impunity/). The case is still ongoing (ref: https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/103141-lafarge-judicial-twists-and-turns-corporate-liability-france.html).
In June 2017, a complaint was filed by Sherpa, the Collective of Civil Parties for Rwanda and Ibuka France, against BNP Paribas in relation to the financing of arms purchases for Rwanda’s genocidal government. The French bank is alleged to be complicit in genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, (ref: https://www.reuters.com/article/rwanda-bnp-paribas-lawsuit-idUSL8N1JQ28V) Following the complaint, a judicial investigation was opened in August 2017 (ref: https://www.ft.com/content/25abe656-a1f3-11e7-9e4f-7f5e6a7c98a2).
Sherpa also called upon Voltalia in May 2020 regarding its relations with a company linked to the Burmese junta (ref: https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2020/05/25/les-liaisons-dangereuses-du-francais-voltalia-avec-la-birmanie_1789332/). Under pressure, Voltalia announced in March 2021 that it would cease its operations in Burma (ref: https://www.justiceformyanmar.org/press-releases/info-birmanie-justice-for-myanmar-reporters-without-borders-and-sherpa-welcome-the-withdrawal-of-voltalia-after-a-year-of-discussions).
In June 2022, Sherpa, Mwatana for Human Rights, and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights filed a complaint against Dassault Aviation, Thales, and MBDA France alleging their complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Yemeni conflict (ref: https://www.rfi.fr/en/international/20220602-rights-groups-accuse-french-arms-makers-of-war-crimes-complicity-in-yemen). Sherpa also participated in an appeal before the Conseil d’État to seek the suspension of arms export licences to countries implicated in the Yemeni conflict[10] in November 2019 (ref: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03932729.2021.1876862). The Conseil d’État rejected the appeal in January 2023 (ref: https://blogs.mediapart.fr/sebastien-nadot/blog/280123/yemen-quils-meurent-dans-lallegresse-de-linjustice-francaise).
==== International crimes in the fashion retail industry ====
In April 2021, Sherpa, with the Collectif Ethique sur l’étiquette, the European Uyghur Institute, and a Uyghur woman, filed a complaint against Inditex, Uniqlo, SMCP, and Skechers for concealment of forced labor and crimes against humanity (ref: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/02/fashion/xinjiang-forced-labor-Zara-Uniqlo-Sketchers.html). These companies are suspected to sell products manufactured, in whole or in part, in factories where Uyghurs are allegedly subjected to forced labour. As a result, an investigation for concealment of crimes against humanity was opened in June 2021 (ref: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/02/france-investigates-fashion-brands-over-forced-uyghur-labour-claims), and closed in April 2023 (ref: https://www.voanews.com/a/fashion-groups-face-new-uyghur-forced-labor-complaint-in-france/7097739.html). A second complaint was issued in May 2023 against the same companies (ref: https://www.voanews.com/a/fashion-groups-face-new-uyghur-forced-labor-complaint-in-france/7097739.html)
== Funding ==
Sherpa operates with grants from French and international private foundations. The NGO is supported in part by the Foundation Charles Léopold Meyer pour le Progrès de l’Homme, as well as the French Development Agency, Open Society Foundations, Humanity United, Ford Foundation, Freedom Fund, File Foundation, Wellsprings (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RA_EN_2021_Sherpa.pdf), Sherpa also benefits from individual donors (ref: https://www.asso-sherpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Audited-accounts-2020-French.pdf).

References

DorineSherpa (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Reply 30-JUN-2023

[edit]

  Unable to implement  

  • Your edit request could not be implemented because the provided references are not formatted correctly.[a] The citation style predominantly used by the Sherpa (association) article is Citation Style 1 (CS1). The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.[b] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. (See WP:CITEVAR.) In the extended section below titled Citation style, I have illustrated two examples: one showing how the edit request was submitted, and another showing how requests should be submitted in the future:
Citation style
Bare URL reference formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.[3]

References


1. https://www.booksource.com
2. http://www.journalsource.com
3. http://www.websource.com

In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the Sherpa (association) article. Using this style, the WikiFormatted text should resemble the following:

Citation Style 1 formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sjöblad|first1=Tristan|title=The Sun|url=http://www.booksource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2020|page=1}}</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Harinath|first1=Prisha|title=Size of the Moon|journal=Science|issue=78|volume=51|url=http://www.journalsource.com|date=2020|page=46}}</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Uemura|first1=Shu|title=The Sun's Heat|url=http://www.websource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2020|page=2}}</ref>

Which displays as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.[3]

References


  1. ^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2020, p. 1.
  2. ^ Harinath, Prisha. (2020). "Size of the Moon", Science, 51(78):46.
  3. ^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2020, p. 2.

In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc., all information which is lost when only the links are provided. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such as yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Kindly resubmit the edit request below at your earliest convenience, taking care to ensure that it makes use of CS1. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards,  Spintendo  19:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ The fault for this formatting error may have originated with the automated prompts used by the edit request template, which asks for a COI editor to "supply the URL of any references used". While the resulting omission of information would not be the fault of the requesting COI editor, it nevertheless remains their responsibility to supply the references formatted in the style used by the article.
  2. ^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.[1]

References

  1. ^ "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. Guideline: It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.
  • What I think should be changed (include citations):

Illicit financial flows and Predation practices on resources

[edit]

Corruption

[edit]

Sarkozy and others

[edit]
Edit request

Since 2011, Sherpa has denounced the problematic nature of economic relations between France and Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan regime [1]. Sherpa first filed a complaint against Amesys [2] regarding the selling of monitoring equipment to the Libyan government. In February 20211, Sherpa filed a second complaint against several members of the Gaddafi clan [3] to investigate the origin of their assets held in France. Following Mediapart'’s revelations during the 'Sarkozy-Gaddafi affair, a judicial investigation was opened in April 2013 [4]. In June 2013, Sherpa filed a civil action [5]. In addition, the case exposed acts of corruption linked to the French company Airbus. They were settled by a Judicial Convention of Public Interest (CJIP), the French equivalent of a criminal transaction, concluded between the company and the Parquet national financier[6].This agreement was subsequently denounced by Sherpa as “another illustration of the longstanding tendency to resort to negotiated justice in corruption” [7]

Dassault – Rafales deal

[edit]

Following a complaint to the Parquet national financier and after more revelation from Mediapart [8] of suspicions of political obstructions to investigate one of french biggest defense company Sherpa filed a civil complaint in April 2021 requesting a judicial investigation into the sale of 36 combat aircraft by Dassault Aviation to India in 2016 [9]. As a result of Sherpa complaint, a judicial investigation was opened in July 2021 [10]

Ill-gotten gains

[edit]

French asset’s restitution mechanism

[edit]

In the wake of its fight against ill-gotten gains, Sherpa advocated actively for the ill-gotten gains restitution mechanism adopted by France in July 2021 [11]

Ill-gotten gains - Equatorial Guinea – Gabon – Congo

[edit]

In March 2007, Sherpa together with Survie and the Congolese Diaspora Federation filed an ill-gotten gains complaint against 5 heads of African governments, including Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, Denis Sassou Nguesso, and Omar Bongo [12] [13] [14]. Following Sherpa complaint, after 15 years of legal battle, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue was convicted by the French justice on 28 July 2021 for the illegal constitution of a luxurious estate [15]. In the case of Omar Bongo, several members of the Bongo family were indicted in 2022 [16].

Ill-gotten gains - Syria

[edit]

In July 2011, Sherpa and Transparency International France filed a complaint targeting the movable and immovable properties held in France by Riffat al-Assad, uncle of Bashar al-Assad, and some twenty people [17]. This complaint was first dismissed, but two new civil actions were filed by Sherpa in September 2013 and April 2014 against Rifaat al-Assad for “concealment of stolen assets, corruption, and aggravated money laundering by organized groups” [18]. As a result of Sherpa and Transparency International work, Rifaat al-Assad was sentenced to 4 years of prison and ordered to forfeit his French real estate assets worth an estimated 90 million euros in December 2019. This sentence was confirmed by the Court of Appeal of Paris in June 2021 [19] and by the Court of Cassation (France) on September 7, 2022 [20]


Tax havens and money laundering

[edit]

Ill-gotten gains - Lebanon

[edit]

Sherpa and the Collective of Victims of Fraudulent and Criminal Practices in Lebanon filed a complaint against X in April 2021 alleging money laundering and exposing suspicious circumstances involving the acquisition of luxury real estate on French territory by Lebanese officials [21]. In June 2021, the Parquet national financier opened an investigation that specifically targeted Riad Salameh, the governor of the Banque du Liban[22]. A similar complaint was also filed with the Luxembourg public prosecutor because the case involved complex arrangements involving Luxembourg-based entities, and lead to the opening of an investigation on December 22 [23].

BNP Paribas, Société Générale, Natixis, CIC, Rivage Investment, Malta

[edit]

Daphne Caruana Galizia, a Maltese journalist, was murdered in October 2017 while investigating a corruption scandal [24]. The Maltese police investigation revealed that Yorgen Fenech, director and shareholder of the company Electrogas, was suspected of being the mastermind behind the murder [25]. In September 2020, Sherpa and the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation requested the Parquet national financier' to open an investigation into BNP Paribas, Société Générale, Natixis, CIC and Rivage Investment involving a loan agreement to Electrogas [26] [27]

Protecting Civic Space

[edit]

Protecting Whistle-blowers and Fighting SLAPP

[edit]

In 2018, Sherpa co-founded with other organisations la Maison des Lanceurs d’Alerte (MLA) [28], which provides daily support to whistleblowers, and carries out actions to raise awareness and mobilise both political decision-makers and public opinion. The NGO is also involved in the fight against Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which are lawsuits used by companies to threaten and harass human rights defenders, journalists, activists, NGOs, whistleblowers, and other actors committed to denouncing their harmful practices [29]. Sherpa is an active member of the Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE) created in 2021 as a reaction to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s murder. [30].

Corporate opacity and Business secrecy

[edit]

Sherpa is actively advocating for the consecration and protection of a right of access to corporate information, to promote further transparency: the NGO denounced specifically the extensive use of business secrecy, tax secrecy, and banking secrecy which contributes to the overall opacity of the industry. In 2018, Sherpa together with journalists and other organisations called for the rejection of the transposition of a European directive allowing business secrecy [31].

[edit]

Sherpa also works to identify and fight threats faced by NGOs that limit their actions in the legal field [32]. Additionally, Sherpa has been denouncing the obstacles that French associations face in obtaining the ministerial approvals necessary to take legal actions in corruption cases [33].

Compelling multinationals to respect human and environmental rights

[edit]

Civil Liability of Parent Companies

[edit]

Duty of vigilance

[edit]

Sherpa was a key player in the adoption of the 2017 law on the corporate duty of vigilance, or duty of care: It requires French companies to establish, publish and effectively implement adapted measures to identify risks and prevent severe human rights abuses, fundamental freedoms, the health and safety of individuals, and the environment [34] [35]. Following the adoption of the law, Sherpa and CCFD Terre Solidaire published the duty of vigilance radar [36]. Since the adoption of the French law, Sherpa is contributing to discussions around a futur european law [37]. Sherpa is a member of the Citizen’s Forum for Corporate Social Responsibility [38] and represents it within the European Coalition for Corporate Justice, a coalition of civil society organisations from all over Europe working on business and human rights, corporate accountability, and corporate social responsibility [39].

Casino / Yves Rocher / Téléperformance

[edit]

In 2019, following a report by UNI Global Union, Sherpa and the union federation put the company Téléperformance on notice to comply with its duty of vigilance regarding human rights [40]. In March 2021, Sherpa, alongside several Brazilian and Colombian indigenous peoples’ organisations (COIAB, CPT, FEIPA, FEPOIMT et OPIAC), and international NGOs (Canopée, Envol Vert, France Nature Environnement, Mighty Earth, Notre Affaire à Tous) sued the Casino group under the duty of vigilance law [41]. The company was accused of sourcing from beef-producing farms at risk of deforestation of the Amazon rainforest, illegal land grabbing of indigenous territories, and forced labour. In March 2022, Sherpa, Actionaid, the Turkish syndicate Petrol-Is, and 34 former employees of the Turkish subsidiary sued Yves Rocher group for failing to comply with its duty of vigilance regarding the freedom to join a union and workers’ fundamental rights. [42].

Environment

[edit]

TotalEnergies

[edit]

In January 2020, Sherpa, alongside 14 local authorities, Notre Affaire à Tous, ZEA, Eco Maires, and France Nature Environnement, brought an action against TotalEnergies. Using the law on the duty of vigilance, the coalition requested that the judge order the oil company to take the necessary measures to comply with the objectives of the Paris Agreement [43]. The tribunal first ruled in favour of the NGOs and local authorities in February 2021 by confirming the jurisdiction, rejecting the oil major’s attempt to bring the dispute before the commercial court. Other local authorities joined the judicial procedure in September 2022, including the cities of Paris and New York [44]. The action brought by associations and local authorities was deemed inadmissible by the judge on July 2023 [45].

Perenco

[edit]

In July 2019, Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France filed an action against the French company Perenco S.A. regarding its oil activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The NGOs sought to obtain additional evidence on the relations between Perenco S.A. and companies operating locally in the DRC through the use of a specific legal tool (article 145 of the French Code of Civil Procedure) [46]. The Cour of Cassation ruled in favour of Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France in March 2022 [47]. A complementary claim was then filed in November 2022 by Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France with the support of the NGO [[Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA-US) requiring Perenco S.A. to remedy harm caused to the environment in Democratic Republic of Congo [48].

Corporate Capture

[edit]

Sherpa also seeks to counter the influence strategies of multinationals and corporate capture. The NGO denounces the growing influence of corporations in a number of areas such as: on public opinion, in policy-making and standard setting, as well as on the corporate standards they must meet [49]. In 2022, the NGOs published recommendations on the adoption of a harder legal framework on lobbying [50]. Sherpa filed two complaints for deceptive business practices against Samsung France in 2013 [51] and Auchan supermarket in 2015 [52]. In the Samsung case, the company’s indictment was dismissed in March 2022, on the grounds of lack of admissibility of the NGOs [53]. The Auchan case followed 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse in light of the labels of the In Extenso brand belonging to the Auchan group found in the rubbles [54]. The dismissal of the case was confirmed in December 2022 [55].

Protecting workers' rights

[edit]

Bolloré – Socapalm

[edit]

Sherpa and several associations filed a complaint before the OECD French National Contact Point (NCP) at the end of 2010 regarding the activities of Socapalm - SOCFIN]] Cameroonian palm plantation company linked to the group Bolloré - concerning social, environmental and land issues denounced by neighboring communities and workers [56]. The NCP mediation led to an action plan for Socapalm [57]. As the plan remained unexecuted by the company [58], Sherpa and other organisations took Bolloré to court to request for a forced execution of the action plan [59].

Vinci - Qatar

[edit]

In March 2015, Sherpa filed, against Vinci Construction Grands Projets' and the French executives of its Qatari subsidiary a complaint alleging reduction to servitude and forced labor, among other complaints, on construction sites in Qatar [60]. Sherpa and the French Comité contre l’Esclavage Moderne (Committee Against Modern Slavery) alongside former Indian and Nepalese construction workers filed a complaint in 2019 [61] following a previous dismissal in 2018 [62]. In November 2022, Vinci Construction Grands Projets was indicted for “obtention of services in exchange for remuneration that is clearly unrelated to the importance of the work performed”, “reduction to servitude”, “submission to working and housing conditions incompatible with human dignity” [63]. Following this procedure, Vinci sued Sherpa for defamation and infringement of presumption of innocence [64]. Sherpa prevailed on the matter of presumption of innocence [65].

International crimes and armed conflicts

[edit]

Multinationals involvement in armed conflicts

[edit]

In November 2016, Sherpa, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), and eleven Syrian former employees of Lafarge filed a complaint against the company Lafarge, including its Syrian subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) and former executives [66]. Lafarge is accused of having transferred up to 13 million euros to various armed groups, including the Islamic State, to continue to maintain its activities in the region. In June 2018, Lafarge SA was charged with complicity in crimes against humanity, financing a terrorist organization, embargo violating an embargo”, and endangering the lives of its Syrian employees [67]. Several former executives were also charged [68]. In June 2017, a complaint was filed by Sherpa, the Collective of Civil Parties for Rwanda and Ibuka France, against BNP Paribas in relation to the financing of arms purchases for [[Rwanda’s genocidal government. The French bank is alleged to be complicit in genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity[69]. Following the complaint, a judicial investigation was opened in August 2017 [70]. In June 2022, Sherpa, Mwatana for Human Rights, and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights filed a complaint against Dassault Aviation, Thales, and MBDA France alleging their complicity in war crimes crimes against humanity during the Yemeni conflict [71]. Sherpa also participated in an appeal before the Conseil d’État to seek the suspension of arms export licences to countries implicated in the Yemeni conflict in November 2019 [72]. The Conseil d’État rejected the appeal in January 2023 [73].

International crimes in the fashion retail industry

[edit]

In April 2021, Sherpa, with the Collectif Ethique sur l’étiquette, the European Uyghur Institute, and a Uyghur woman, filed a complaint against Inditex, Uniqlo, SMCP, and Skechers for concealment of forced labor and crimes against humanity [74]. These companies are suspected to sell products manufactured, in whole or in part, in factories where Uyghurs are allegedly subjected to forced labour. As a result, an investigation for concealment of crimes against humanity was opened in June 2021 [75], and closed in April 2023. A second complaint was issued in May 2023 against the same companies [76].

Funding

[edit]

Sherpa operates with grants from French and international private foundations. The NGO is supported in part by the Foundation Charles Léopold Meyer pour le Progrès de l’Homme, as well as the French Development Agency, Open Society Foundations, Humanity United, Ford Foundation, Freedom Fund, File Foundation, Wellsprings [77]. Sherpa also benefits from individual donors [78].

References

  1. ^ "France - Libya Case, From The Financing Of Sarkozy's Campaign To Transnational Grand Corruption". Sherpa. n.d. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  2. ^ Nabila, Ramdani (19 September 2011). "Gaddafi evading capture in a Mercedes 4x4 bristling with anti-tracking systems... and it was given to him by Nicolas Sarkozy". Daily Mail. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  3. ^ "France investigates Gaddafi, Mubarak assets". Reuters. Paris. 25 February 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  4. ^ "Former French President Sarkozy charged over Libyan financing". Al Jazeera. 16 October 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  5. ^ "Financement de la campagne 2007 de Sarkozy : l'ONG Sherpa partie civile" [Financing Sarkozy's 2007 campaign: the NGO Sherpa as a civil party] (PDF). AFP (in French). 30 September 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  6. ^ "Aviation giant Airbus settles €16 million fine to halt corruption investigation". RFI. 12 December 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  7. ^ "Financing of Sarkozy's 2007 presidential election by Libyan authorities: Airbus corruption cases in Libya face negotiated justice" (Press release). Paris: Sherpa. 29 November 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  8. ^ Philippin, Yann (16 January 2023). "'Rafale Papers': how France's anti-corruption agency covered up for aviation firm Dassault". Mediapart. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  9. ^ Nayak Dutta, Amrita (23 November 2018). "French NGO files corruption complaint against Rafale deal". The Print. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  10. ^ Philippin, Yann (2 July 2021). "'Rafale Papers': France opens judicial probe into fighter deal with India, new revelations emerge". Mediapart. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  11. ^ Desai, Shweta (3 May 2013). "France adopts bill allowing return of 'ill-gotten' assets". Anadolu Agency. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  12. ^ Dihmis, Lara (30 July 2021). "France Upholds Graft Ruling Against Equatorial Guinea's VP". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  13. ^ Arfi, Fabrice (12 February 2015). "The 'ill-gotten gains' French police found in Congo ruling clan's penthouse". Mediapart. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  14. ^ Chrisafis, Angelique (6 February 2016). "France impounds African autocrats' 'ill-gotten gains'". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  15. ^ "French court to rule on illegal assets of E. Guinea president son". France 24. 28 July 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  16. ^ "France charges 5 more children of ex-Gabonese leader Bongo over 'ill-gotten assets'". Africa News. 28 July 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  17. ^ "French rights groups to file suit against Assad". Reuters. Paris. 26 July 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  18. ^ "Ill-Gotten Gains – The Rifaat Al-Assad Case: Interview With Laura Rousseau (Sherpa)". uncaccoalition.org. UNCAC Coalition. 4 August 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  19. ^ "French court sentences Bashar al-Assad's uncle to 4 years in prison for financial crimes". France 24. 9 September 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  20. ^ "French court upholds conviction of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's uncle". Samaa TV. 7 September 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  21. ^ Rozelier, Muriel (11 May 2021). "Victims of financial collapse in Lebanon resort to the French courts". L’Orient Le Jour. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  22. ^ "France opens probe into personal wealth of Lebanon's central bank chief". France 24. 6 June 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  23. ^ Stocks, Tom; Dihmis, Lara (12 November 2021). "France Upholds Graft Ruling Against Equatorial Guinea's VP". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  24. ^ "Daphne Caruana Galizia: Two brothers guilty of killing Maltese journalist". BBC News. 14 October 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  25. ^ Bouvart, Arthur; Michel, Anne (15 October 2020). "The Unswept Corners Of Daphne's Murder". Forbidden stories. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  26. ^ Rousseau, Laura; Mensous, Chanez (16 October 2020). "Zero tolerance for corruption - NGO Sherpa". Times Of Malta. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  27. ^ "Complaint in France against BNPP, SocGen, Natixis, CIC and Rivage" (Press release). Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation. 5 October 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  28. ^ "Les organisations membres de la Maison des Lanceurs d'Alerte" [Member organisations of La Maison des Lauceurs d’Alerte]. mlalerte.org (in French). La Maison des Lanceurs d’Alerte. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  29. ^ "Ending Gag Lawsuits in Europe – Protecting Democracy and Fundamental Rights". whistleblowingnetwork.org. Whistleblowing International Network. n.d. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  30. ^ "About us". www.the-case.eu. Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe. n.d. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  31. ^ "Stop Trade Secrets". stoptradesecrets.eu. Stop Trade Secrets coalition. n.d. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  32. ^ "Décryptage : la recevabilité de l'action associative devant les juridictions pénales en question" [Focus on: the admissibility of association actions before the criminal courts in question]. www.asso-sherpa.org. Sherpa. June 2022. Retrieved 2 August 2023.
  33. ^ Lecadre, Renaud (23 June 2023). "Lutte contre la corruption - L'ONG Anticor privée de son agrément par le tribunal administratif" [Fight against corruption - The administrative court deprives the NGO Anticor of its accreditation]. Libération (in French). Retrieved 2 August 2023.
  34. ^ Cossart, Sandra; Chaplier, Jérôme; Beau de Loménie, Tiphaine (15 June 2017). "The French Law on Duty of Care: A Historic Step Towards Making Globalization Work for All". Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press. 2 (2): 317–323. doi:10.1017/bhj.2017.14. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  35. ^ Barbière, Cécile (23 February 2017). "France leads EU on duty of care requirements for multinationals". Euractiv. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  36. ^ "Sherpa releases new guidance & legal analysis on French duty of vigilance law". Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. 12 February 2019. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  37. ^ "Duty of care: European Parliament calls for tighter supervision of companies #152". Paris Good Fashion. 15 March 2023. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  38. ^ "Liste des Membres" [Member organisations]. forumcitoyenpourlarse.org (in French). Forum Citoyen pour la RSE. n.d. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  39. ^ "Members". corporatejustice.org. European Coalition for Corporate Justice. n.d. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  40. ^ Suing Goliath (PDF) (Report). European Coalition for Corporate Justice. September 2021. p. 68. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  41. ^ Morrow, Amanda (4 March 2021). "French supermarket giant Casino sued over links to Amazon deforestation". RFI. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  42. ^ "Turkey: Yves Rocher, the French cosmetics company, facing court proceedings for failure to ensure workers' rights and trade union rights". Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. 24 March 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  43. ^ Vetter, David (30 January 2020). "This French Lawsuit Is Making Oil Companies Nervous". Forbes. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  44. ^ "Paris and New York join climate litigation against TotalEnergies". Reuters. Paris. 21 September 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  45. ^ Mallet, Benjamin (6 July 2023). "French court rejects NGOs' bid to compel TotalEnergies to curb emissions". Reuters. Paris. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  46. ^ "Amis de la Terre and Sherpa v. Perenco". climate-laws.org. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. n.d. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  47. ^ "Sherpa's advisers against Perenco uncovered, association prepares action on the merits". Africa Business +. 15 March 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2023.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  48. ^ Kaminski, Isabella (29 December 2022). "Why environmental disaster victims are looking to European courts". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  49. ^ "Advocacy and Strategic Litigation". asso-sherpa.org. Sherpa. n.d. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  50. ^ "Lobbying : « Une régulation s'impose pour rétablir l'équilibre du débat public et faire primer l'intérêt général »" [Lobbying: "Regulation is needed to restore balance to public debate and ensure that the public interest takes precedence"]. Le Monde (in French). 21 September 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  51. ^ Chapman, Ben (6 July 2023). "Samsung faces charges over 'misleading' ethics claims after alleged labour abuses in factories". The Independant. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  52. ^ "France's Auchan sued over Bangladesh disaster". The Local. 25 April 2014. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  53. ^ "Auchan lawsuit (re garment factories in Bangladesh)". www.business-humanrights.org/. Business and Human Rights resource centre. n.d. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  54. ^ "French Retailer Faces Legal Action in Wake of Bangladesh Disaster". News Max Finance. 24 April 2014. Retrieved 20 July 2023.
  55. ^ "Auchan and fairwashing – Appeal juges rule in favor of the multinational : case is dismissed again" (Press release). Paris: Sherpa. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  56. ^ "Sherpa et al. vs Bolloré". oecdwatch.org. OECD Watch. n.d. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  57. ^ "Circonstance spécifique "Socapalm, Groupes Bolloré et Socfin au Cameroun"" [Specific circumstances "Socapalm, Bolloré and Socfin Groups in Cameroon"] (Press release). Paris: Direction Générale du Trésor. 27 March 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  58. ^ "Socapalm Specific Instance – Bollore And Socfin Groups - Statement From The French National Contact Point On 18 May 2016" (Press release). Paris: France National Contact Point. 16 May 2016. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  59. ^ "Bolloré faces lawsuit over Cameroon palm oil workers". Africa Times. 28 May 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  60. ^ Willsher, Kim (26 April 2015). "France: Vinci Construction investigated over Qatar forced labour claims". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  61. ^ "Vinci denies new allegations of forced labor in Qatar". Reuters. Paris. 22 November 2018. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  62. ^ "Vinci Case in Qatar". asso-sherpa.org. Sherpa. n.d. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  63. ^ Vandoorne, Saskya; Bracken, Natacha (10 November 2022). "World Cup 2022: French firm under investigation over alleged labor abuses in Qatar". CNN. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  64. ^ "Case Study: Slapp Suits Against Sherpa By Vinci Construction". mindthegap.ngo. Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO). 8 July 2020. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  65. ^ "CA Paris, pôle 2 - ch. 7, 28 juin 2017, n° 16/09177". www.doctrine.fr. FORSETI SAS. 28 June 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  66. ^ "French company Lafarge probed over alleged Syrian activity". AP News. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  67. ^ Héraud, Béatrice (8 July 2018). "Lafarge Charged With "Complicity In Crimes Against Humanity"". Novethic. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  68. ^ Medina, Alicia (25 May 2022). "French multinational company Lafarge to face charges of complicity in crimes against humanity: A crack in corporate impunity?". Syria Direct. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  69. ^ "NGOs file suit alleging BNP Paribas complicity in Rwandan genocide". Reuters. 29 June 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  70. ^ Mcnicoll, Tracy (29 June 2017). "French bank BNP Paribas accused of complicity in Rwandan genocide". France 24. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  71. ^ "Rights groups accuse French arms makers of war crimes complicity in Yemen". RFI. 2 June 2022. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  72. ^ Giovanna, Maletta (5 February 2021). "Seeking a Responsible Arms Trade to Reduce Human Suffering in Yemen". Italian Journal of International Affairs. 56 (1): 73–91. doi:10.1080/03932729.2021.1876862. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  73. ^ "War in Yemen: France's highest administrative court refuses to examine the legality of arms sales" (Press release). Paris: Sherpa. 6 February 2023. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  74. ^ Paton, Elizabeth; Gallois, Léontine; Breeden, Aurelien (2 July 2021). "Fashion Retailers Face Inquiry Over Suspected Ties to Forced Labor in China". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  75. ^ Henley, Jon (2 July 2021). "France investigates fashion brands over forced Uyghur labour claims". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  76. ^ "Fashion Groups Face New Uyghur Forced Labor Complaint in France". VOA News. 17 May 2023. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  77. ^ Annual Report (PDF) (Report). Sherpa. 2021. p. 56. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  78. ^ Rapport du commissaire aux comptes sur les comptes annuels - exercice du 1er janvier au 31 decembre 2020 [Statutory auditor's report on the annual financial statements - financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2020] (PDF) (Report) (in French). Sherpa. 2021. p. 8. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  • Why it should be changed:

Update the page with more information and newest information!

DorineSherpa (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined Per WP:NOTADVOCACY. I apologize for asking you to place your citations in style 1 when it's evident that the majority of your text falls under the not advocacy guideline. Checking a submission for citation style correctness is usually my first step when answering a request, and if that's not in order, I then ask for it to be changed without further reading the request. In retrospect, I question whether that was the right strategy here, as it had you performing work which ultimately proved unnecessary. For that, I sincerely apologize. Regards,  Spintendo  10:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Spintendo, many thanks for your reply and your time! No worries for the citations. One question, if I keep just the info about the legal case (date, companies and legal based), could it be accepted ? I can suggest something here. It's a shame some information doesn't appear on the page as some of it are just facts. Many thank for your reply. DorineSherpa (talk) 10:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Spintendo, just following up on my previous message. I would be really keen to submit something shorter and a avoid any points related to advocacy. I can make a submission here if it's better ?
It's a shame that there is no information at all about the ongoing cases.
Many thanks for your time! DorineSherpa (talk) 09:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References