This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Solomon family is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Wouldn't this be better off as a "Solomon family" article? Samuel Moss has no claim to notability except that his descendants did stuff, and the whole article is a family tree. The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, but hesitated over title. There were several other, though not so prominent, Solomon families in SA, and this lot is not confined to SA though probably most significant here. The Dunn family, which I'm looking at now, has the same problems. The pater familias came out here at an advanced age and promptly died, but is the common factor with a lit of people called Dunn. BTW check out talk Talk:Vaiben Solomon. Should be interesting but $59.95 plus p&p is outside my budget. Doug butler (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem at putting it at "Solomon family" as long as there is not another Solomon family with similar dynastic notability. I don't think the Dunn family would be notable by contrast - only three members notable enough to be on Wikipedia (which can easily link to each other directly); the rest of it is family tree that ideally wouldn't be on Wikipedia. If you're in a capital city, I'm sure your local state library will get a copy of the Solomon family book soon. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also think it'd be worth going through and checking if it's worth adding redlinks on some of these - for one, Ess Solomon (the city councillor) is definitely notable in my book and should have an article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I came to the talk page to suggest what's already been discussed here. Therefore, I've moved the page. There's no harm in finding an even more appropriate title. I suggest that the lead needs to be rewritten, as this isn't about Samuel Moss Solomon, but about the family as a whole. Schwede6605:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
