Talk:Spirit safe

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

More details in the diagram / questions on built-in devices

To make the diagram more useful I would like to see it depicting

1) the built-in hydrometers (Is there one per inlet?)
2) any built-in flow rate measuring devices (I assume there must be some in order for customs to determine the amount of liquids processed) (Is there one per outlet?)
3) the built-in device for determing if the "emerging spirit no longer turns water cloudy" as mentioned in the text (How does this device look like and how does it work?)

Even in the case that nobody can come up with a more detailed graphical scheme, I will be happy if one of you experts could please answers my questions. Patagonier 18:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patagonier (talk • contribs)

Straight copy of text?

It seems that most of this content is taken and copied directly from http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usfeatures/maltwhisky/spiritsafe.html which marks it's pages as copyright Undiscovered Scotland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.71.68 (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit Safe → Spirit safe — Reason: Wikipedia title capitalization. Wahrmund (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Possibly uncontroversial. Andrewa (talk) 06:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

International point of view missing

This article is very focused on Scotch Whiskey, which is understandable I guess... but an international point of view would be welcomed, as whisky is now produced all over the world. For example, I happen to know that spirit safes aren't locked in Sweden due to different tax regulations, but they are obviously still in use, as the stillman needs it to control the distillation process. It seems they are still called "spirit safe" for traditional reasons, even though they aren't locked. It would be interesting to know if this is true for other whisky producing countries also. Are there any experts from other countries around that can shed some light on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavleson (talk • contribs) 16:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20050311085248/https://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usfeatures/maltwhisky/spiritsafe.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]