Talk:St Cuthbert Without

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CCHT external link

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:11, 07 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I am proposing to merge several articles into St Cuthbert Without. These are: Blackwell, Cumbria; Brisco, Cumbria; Carleton, Carlisle; and Durdar. These are all very brief and largely unreferenced stubs relating to villages / hamlets within the parish, and the information they contain can be easily contained in this article. I haven't included the other settlement in the parish, Wreay, for which a decent article already exists – more developed than the St Cuthbert one, actually. Jellyman (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would point out that some appear to have been townships so there could be info to add regarding population and administration. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the 4 suggested,

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 22:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellyman and Klbrain: Should Brisco and Carleton have been merged? In between tagging them in January 2017 and them being merged in July 2018 I added population data for Brisco and Carleton. A township with a stated population surely in some way constitutes a legally recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. While Klbrain is correct that there wasn't and express objection my comment above at least casts doubt. I however agree with keeping Blackwell and Durdar merged as indeed those don't contain any significant content. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to proposal a WP:SPLIT; I don't think that a merge reverse 3 years on is appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, tagged split for the 2 suggested above. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the Brisco article given the above and the fact the proposer didn't object, I asked above since if the proposer had have agreed I could have done it straight away but otherwise a reverse proposal probably has to be made which I have now done. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carleton now done, others left merged since the original concerns still remain. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]