Talk:Stage monitor system

Professional sound production High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Foldback (sound engineering)

I'm not sure how this happened but we seem to now have two articles on the same topic. These should be merged together. Based on previous discussion it looks like Stage monitor or Stage monitor system is probably the best title for this material. If there are no objections, I can start by merging Foldback (sound engineering) content to this article. ~Kvng (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they should be combined and that stage monitor system is probably the better title. Foldback seems to be a mostly European/British term. I have never heard it used in the press or in America. Robert.Harker (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the two articles should be merged. Foldback, despite being more often heard in the UK, is the better, more general term if the topic is going to mention interruptible foldback (IFB), headphones or in-ear monitors. Stage monitoring is limited to stage wedges, sidefills, drum fills, and any other loudspeakers aimed primarily at the performer. Binksternet (talk) 01:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: of course we will end up with Foldback (sound engineering) as a redirect to the merged article and can mention the term in bold in the lead. We need to pick a single title and previous discussion seemed to show consensus for Stage monitor or Stage monitor system. Of course that was 7 years ago. Do you see reason to reopen that discussion? ~Kvng (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't hurt to ask the community again, especially after so many years. Binksternet (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it wouldn't hurt but I'm a fan of WP:BOLD and I would have already done it if it were a smaller job. It's pretty clear that we shouldn't have two separate articles on this topic. I'm just trying to flush out any unexpected objection before investing the time into this. Binksternet, do you personally have any objections or advice? ~Kvng (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No advice. Let's just do it. Binksternet (talk) 21:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still prepared to do this. Just haven't gotten around to it yet. I did not specify in my original proposal whether the final article would be called Foldback (sound engineering) or Stage monitor system. I've touched up the banners to propose the latter. Article can always be moved after the merge if that's not good. ~Kvng (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Kvng (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]