Talk:Stockwell

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

This page is part of the WikiProject London: please add information about this area to this article

In the article's sub section about the population of STOCKWELL there is a closing reference to robert kilroy silk - it is an error - the original reference was simply to "Kilroy" - it was a joke refereence to a local stockwell toilet watch blog82.3.45.14 (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC) - and a subsequent editor has taken it to have been a refeernce to Kilroy Silk.[reply]

gained a certain unexpected and unwelcome notoriety

Not encyclopedic language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, edited. Dubmill (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

excellent transport links

POV and not that true. One underground station and a few buses don't make for excellence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stockwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]