Talk:Surfactant leaching
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
What more can be said?
[edit]After seeing the text, image, and citation I added to exudate pulled into this redirect title I created, and seeing it expanded a bit, I am wondering what more needs to be said. I am not sure this topic warrants a stand-alone article when the material would fit nicely in the exudate article.
I'm interested to see this expanded if possible, but if not, then it should be merged back. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. You claim you are scientist. I am baffled you fail to see this is a completely separate subject, in different categories. We do not merge oranges and orangs. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- I understand a small stub is an eyesore. But you have to find a really relevant "supersubject". In our case that would be the missing article Paint defects (bleeding, blistering, chalking, clouding, cracking, cratering, crinkling, flaking, .... ). Staszek Lem (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)