Talk:Susan Hockey

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Speedy deletion is not for clean-up issues, so this should not have been tagged. A simple google search reveals notability (A University College of London Lecture named after the person should make you think "hmmm, maybe there is something to this). I inserted stronger citations into the lede. Please remove speedy deletion tag and mark for cleanup and expansion (stub is oky doky too). Thanks! Thebrycepeake (talk) 12:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC) • Also, a CV does not fall under copyright violation - it is simply a list of publications that can be reproduced anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebrycepeake (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The entire text is copied from the website listed, this is a copyright violation. Also, a CV is just a list of achievements, which is promotional, not neutral tone. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thebrycepeake, I speedied this once, but since she is clearly notable and the deletion has been challenged (and not just by the obvious sock- and meat-puppets), I've been through removing obvious spam and the lengthy copyright violation. Her career could still be taken as a copyviol, but since it is a sequential list anyway, not sure how that could be addressed. Joseph2302, you are right that, however notable she is, copyright violations and spam cannot be accepted. I's remove the SD tags for now, but feel free to nom for SD or other if you don't thionk the problems have been adequately addressed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Seems okay to me now. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302, thanks. Thebrycepeake, it would be better anyway to have some referenced prose identifying important publications rather than a list of everything she's ever witten with no clue why any of it matters Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

group of editors will go through and revise to ensure adheres to guidelines including neutral tone; agreed that this is notable. DCavendish (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Clean Up

need to insert titles for three items - ran out of time DCavendish (talk) 16:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]