Talk:TNF inhibitor
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about TNF inhibitor.
|
Possibly imprecise entry name-anti-TNF therapeutics?
[edit]By pharmacological definition, inhibitor is blocker of enzymatic activity. TNF is not an enzyme; it is a cytokine. Bioaction of TNF is blocked by affinity-based(antibody) drugs, but still, these drugs don't inhibit enzymatic action of TNF; they do sequester TNF from endogenous TNF receptor. Therefore, proper title of the entry might be "anti-TNF therapeutics". Edta450 (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Ustekinumab is not a TNF-blocker, thus it should not be listed in this chapter (psoriasis section)Vorticus (talk) 21:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
TNF-alpha
[edit]Could it be made clearer whether all TNF inhibitors are inhibitors of only TNF-alpha ? Rod57 (talk) 02:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Pentoxyfylline
[edit]Should we mention anti-TNF activity of pentoxyfylline? JFW | T@lk 17:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've added a ref, but feel free to expand. --Arcadian (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I think no, because many other drugs, including methotrexate, or substances may have some anti-TNF activity.Vorticus (talk) 21:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Golimumab not listed?
[edit]Simponi, aka golimumab, was recently approved. [1] Ronabop (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Yes, it was approved for psoriatic arthritis. In addition to golimumab, also certolizumabVorticus (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC).
Side effects
[edit]It says patients are at increased risk of opportunistic fungal infections. Can anyone say why only fungal and not bacterial infections ? Are all the TNF inhibitors the same in this respect ? Are they generally immunosuppresive ? and why ? Rod57 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC) A correct statement may be opportunistic infections (not only fungal). Anyway the major risk for this class of drugs is tuberculosis which is a bacterial disease.Vorticus (talk) 21:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on TNF inhibitor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917104658/http://knol.google.com/k/top-ten-twenty-best-selling-drugs-2009 to http://knol.google.com/k/top-ten-twenty-best-selling-drugs-2009#Best_selling_therapeutic_categoriesBest_selling_therapeutic_categoriesef
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Thalidomide is not Immunoprine
[edit]Immunoprine is Azathioprine, please correct it. The information on the article is dangerously misleading.1osecampo (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)