Talk:Temptastic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose merging Yayaya and Wae Ireoni? into this article. Those song articles are short and don't say much, and there is probably little that could be legitimately added to them to make the articles better. The material would be better served being discussed in this article instead, to fill out the album article better (it's in bad shape). Most songs fail song notability requirements, and per WP:SONGS, most songs should not have standalone articles. Please share your comments. Shinyang-i (talk) 05:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose. The songs are notable. The articles are not stubs and contain lots of useful information. The articles are expandable. If you redirect them, you will prevent people from expanding them. You will deny Wikipedia the opportunity to grow. --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't get why you think every single song promoted by these girl groups is the kind of significantly-discussed, culturally-impacting, earth-shattering song that Wikipedia demands from songs that merit their own articles. These articles, like all the other articles you've commented on, are essentially track listings and lists of dates. Show me how that even comes close to meeting what is required on Wikipedia for articles about songs. Shinyang-i (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The album article says almost nothing, and the song articles are both very short. It makes sense to merge them. The songs may be notable but it doesn't look like the album is notable apart from the singles. I think one merged article would present the information in a better way, and there is nothing preventing people from expanding that. Random86 (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge & redirect songs to album. There is currently too little info to keep songs as separate articles while album page is tiny. However, also redirect song titles to album, and each page could one day, if super-famous, return as separate song article with contents already in prior revisions. -Wikid77 (talk) 21:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.