Talk:The 6th Day

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The 6th Day article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

anti-science propaganda and native advertising

blatant republican anti-cloning propaganda. also included, in-movie advertisements spanning on-star, the XFL, etc. pure garbage, a commercial that also includes anti-science republican propaganda. honestly, i know this will be deleted now that i understand what a shithole sellout wikipedia is. enjoy sucking the teat of oppressors, whoever deletes this. and by teat, you know what i really mean. and you did it.

Seriously that’s what you got from this? The fact that Wikipedia allowed your opinion speaks volumes.

Raelism

"there are also references to the Raelian concept of immortality through cloning and personality transfer." What is that crap? Human cloning and personality transfer has NOTHING to do with raelism. Just because the religion does include some of it, doesn't mean cloning has anything to do with raelism. Ran4 04:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sixth day.jpg

Image:Sixth day.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The plot summary states that the film takes place in 2028, yet the film makes no specific mention of a date. It merely states "In the near future.....sooner than you think." This could be stating the fact that cloning is becoming more and more possible, but regardless, it still doesn't mention a date. The plot summary should be changed accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.177.246 (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

now it says the film is set in 2015, agian their is no mention of the date, year or decade or even century in this film like the comment above the only confirmation that this film is even set in the future is because the opening credits read in the near future......sooner than you think —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.195.98 (talk) 10:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only mention to any kind of date as far as I know is at the start of the film, when the captions "The Near Future" & "Closer Than You Think" appear. 194.74.238.137 (talk) 13:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm not sure, but I don't think that that date is used in the films novelisation either. 194.74.238.137 (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critics/Reception

A section should be added, which summarizes the critical reception of this movie, like in other movies related Wikipedia articles. Is anyone by chance interested in researching some information and expanding the article? White rotten rabbit (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of salary to summary?

Why would Schwarzenegger's salary be part of the film summary? Perhaps it could be moved to a more relevant section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.236.158 (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concurred --86.31.225.239 (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Similarities with Sister

Hi,

There are several similarities in the scenario with the novel Sister by Rosamund Lupton. Where this could be added? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]