Talk:The Cat Who Went Bananas

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Cat Who Went Bananas article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Another Believer (talk · contribs) on 6 February 2020.
It was contested by Coolabahapple (talk · contribs) with the comment:
multiple views (added to article) held by over 1800 libraries! so meets WP:NBOOK/WP:GNG.

Novels: Crime Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linked to this from the ESP disambiguation page and am not convinced this is not a bizarre prank of some kind. 170.74.56.78 (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

This shouldn't have passed AfD with these sources. Librarian trade publications are not a sign of independent notability since they review fairly indiscriminately. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 04:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]