Talk:The Lost Tapes (Nas album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Lost Tapes (Nas album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The Lost Tapes (Nas album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 26, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Lost Tapes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk • contribs • count) 00:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per request at my talkpage. I am currently restoring information at Evan Bogart's article. As I finish it I'll review this article. 00:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
See below

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Background

"No cameos. No hype. No bullsh*t" -> It is really censored? Well, it already has a PA (just a comment)

File:No Idea's Original.ogg has to be reduced to 18s per WP:SAMPLE.

Recording

both Nas' 1999 album -> albums

"Blaze a 50," "Drunk by Myself," "Poppa Was a Playa," -> "Blaze a 50", "Drunk by Myself", "Poppa Was a Playa", -> the comma is not part of the song's title

Music

"Doo Rags," -> "Doo Rags",

On "My Way," he -> as above

"No Idea's Original," ; "I'm Gonna Love You Just a Little More Baby," ; "Purple," he ;

""Poppa Was a Playa" features uncredited co-production by Kanye West and discusses Nas' complicated relationship with his father, jazz musician Olu Dara,[27]" -> "Poppa Was a Playa" features uncredited co-production by Kanye West,[27] and discusses Nas' complicated relationship with his father, jazz musician Olu Dara,^{[citation needed]} (I think this is in the reference 28)

"An untitled hidden track, known under the titles" -> ^{[by whom?]}

Sequel

"put them together - 12 songs for one album" -> "put them together — 12 songs for one album"

This is false, per MOS:DASH--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫_Hey ^{it's me}_{I am dynamite} 18:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Ref 1, 8 and 17 -> Onion Inc.. -> Onion Inc. / Time Inc.. -> Time Inc. / Daily News, L.P.. -> Daily News, L.P.

Ref 14: Link Allmusic and Rovi Corporation

Ref 36: Amazon.com. -> Amazon.com Inc.

Ref 47: ^ Rolling Stone (2004), p. 569. -> Is not incomplet?

References

Adam Bradley -> Bradley, Adam

Nathan Brackett -> Brackett, Nathan

Dax-Devlon Ross -> Ross, Dax-Devlon

Cameron Lazerine -> Lazerine, Cameron

Second opinion

I am requesting second opinion on prose. I am not a native English speaker so I don't know if something in prose is wrong. As I could read it is OK, but to avoid future mistakes. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "No cameos" line is censored this way. I don't think the file reduction is necessary; the 30s/10% whichever shorter is just a rule of thumb and doesn't imply strict application, only necessity being "must be short in comparison to the original song" (WP:MOS (samples)). I made logical punctuation corrections to song titles and others. Cleaned up the citation mix-up in the Music section. Corrected publisher in citations. Ref 47 is sufficient, to my knowledge, for refering the book in the References section, while Allmusic and Rovi Corporation are already linked in the Notes section, linking only on first-reference (WP:Wikilink). Last, first correction to book references. Dan56 (talk) 03:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

to all. Now, I'll wait until someone gives a second opinion on prose. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The prose looks good to me. Herr Beethoven (talk) 22:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree the prose looks fine. TRLIJC19 (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, I believe in both users above and I pass the GA nomination. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'fued' - wat

its feud. uh, i didn't know where this goes and couldn't do it myself. whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.54.244 (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Lost Tapes (Nas album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030106114212

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Lost Tapes (Nas album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030106114212

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]