Talk:The Pile
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]It's highly unlikely that anything from the WTC is going to be used to build a new battleship - they became obsolete 50 years ago, and there are no plans for more. A new submarine I could believe however. Stan 02:29 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
I see now, it's an amphibious assault ship in the works. Stan 02:33 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
- Although I couldn't help looking it up. The US military being what it is these days, anything's possible. ;) - Hephaestos 02:36 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
I'm not arguing its mention in the article, but I just have to ask if anyone can understand their reasoning: why would calling it "Ground Zero" have been any less respectful of the victims than "The Pile"? I think I'd be more disturbed by "The Pile" myself. -- John Owens 22:06 May 2, 2003 (UTC) --
Merged to World Trade Center site
[edit]I moved the entire contents to World Trade Center site. The merge discussion took place on the talk page of Ground zero [1], the target page of the merge proposal. --Grocer 07:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)